Literature DB >> 20585960

Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Naoki Iwata1, Michitaka Fujiwara, Yasuhiro Kodera, Chie Tanaka, Norifumi Ohashi, Goro Nakayama, Masahiko Koike, Akimasa Nakao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery requires fundamental skills peculiar to endoscopic procedures such as eye-hand coordination. Acquisition of such skills prior to performing actual surgery is highly desirable for favorable outcome. Virtual-reality simulators have been developed for both surgical training and assessment of performance. The aim of the current study is to show construct validity of a novel simulator, LapVR (Immersion Medical, San Jose, CA, USA), for Japanese surgeons and surgical residents.
METHODS: Forty-four subjects were divided into the following three groups according to their experience in laparoscopic surgery: 14 residents (RE) with no experience in laparoscopic surgery, 14 junior surgeons (JR) with little experience, and 16 experienced surgeons (EX). All subjects executed "essential task 1" programmed in the LapVR, which consists of six tasks, resulting in automatic measurement of 100 parameters indicating various aspects of laparoscopic skills.
RESULTS: Time required for each task tended to be inversely correlated with experience in laparoscopic surgery. For the peg transfer skill, statistically significant differences were observed between EX and RE in three parameters, including total time and average time taken to complete the procedure and path length for the nondominant hand. For the cutting skill, similar differences were observed between EX and RE in total time, number of unsuccessful cutting attempts, and path length for the nondominant hand. According to the programmed comprehensive evaluation, performance in terms of successful completion of the task and actual experience of the participants in laparoscopic surgery correlated significantly for the peg transfer (P=0.007) and cutting skills (P=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: The peg transfer and cutting skills could best distinguish between EX and RE. This study is the first to provide evidence that LapVR has construct validity to discriminate between novice and experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585960     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1184-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Pamela B Andreatta; Derek T Woodrum; John D Birkmeyer; Rajani K Yellamanchilli; Gerard M Doherty; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Elspeth M McDougall; Federico A Corica; John R Boker; Leandro G Sala; Gabriela Stoliar; James F Borin; Frank T Chu; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind.

Authors:  Richard K Reznick; Helen MacRae
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Derek T Woodrum; Pamela B Andreatta; Rajani K Yellamanchilli; Lauren Feryus; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator.

Authors:  Aimin Zhang; Michael Hünerbein; Yiyang Dai; Peter M Schlag; Siegfried Beller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room.

Authors:  Pavi S Kundhal; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  19 in total

1.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.

Authors:  A Chellali; W Ahn; G Sankaranarayanan; J T Flinn; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; Suvranu De; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Achieving Interface and Environment Fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Helena Mentis; Amie Miller; Woojin Ahn; Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.632

4.  Introduction of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a tale of two cities.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Operator experience determines performance in a simulated computer-based brain tumor resection task.

Authors:  Terrell Holloway; Zachary S Lorsch; Michael A Chary; Stanislaw Sobotka; Maximillian M Moore; Anthony B Costa; Rolando F Del Maestro; Joshua Bederson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Justin D Rivard; Ashley S Vergis; Bertram J Unger; Krista M Hardy; Chris G Andrew; Lawrence M Gillman; Jason Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer.

Authors:  Venkata Arikatla; Sam Horvath; Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Suvranu De; Steve Schwaitzberg; Andinet Enquobahrie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.

Authors:  A Chellali; L Zhang; G Sankaranarayanan; V S Arikatla; W Ahn; A Derevianko; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; M DeMoya; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Surgeon-Authored Virtual Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Module Is Judged Effective and Preferred Over Traditional Teaching Tools.

Authors:  Sergei Kurenov; Juan Cendan; Saleh Dindar; Kristopher Attwood; James Hassett; Ruth Nawotniak; Gregory Cherr; William G Cance; Jörg Peters
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.

Authors:  Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Amine Chellali; Suvranu De; G L Caroline; John Hwabejire; Marc DeMoya; Steven Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.