Literature DB >> 25159626

Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.

A Chellali1, W Ahn, G Sankaranarayanan, J T Flinn, S D Schwaitzberg, D B Jones, Suvranu De, C G L Cao.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) trainer is currently the standard for training and evaluating basic laparoscopic skills. However, its manual scoring system is time-consuming and subjective. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST©) is the virtual version of the FLS trainer which allows automatic and real time assessment of skill performance, as well as force feedback. In this study, the VBLaST© pattern cutting (VBLaST-PC©) and ligating loop (VBLaST-LL©) tasks were evaluated as part of a validation study. We hypothesized that performance would be similar on the FLS and VBLaST© trainers, and that subjects with more experience would perform better than those with less experience on both trainers.
METHODS: Fifty-five subjects with varying surgical experience were recruited at the Learning Center during the 2013 SAGES annual meeting and were divided into two groups: experts (PGY 5, surgical fellows and surgical attendings) and novices (PGY 1-4). They were asked to perform the PC or the ligating loop task on the FLS and the VBLaST© trainers. Their performance scores for each trainer were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the FLS and VBLaST© scores for either the PC or the ligating loop task. Experts' scores were significantly higher than the scores for novices on both trainers.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that the subjects' performance on the VBLaST© trainer was similar to the FLS performance for both tasks. Both the VBLaST-PC© and the VBLaST-LL© tasks permitted discrimination between the novice and expert groups. Although concurrent and discriminant validity has been established, further studies to establish convergent and predictive validity are needed. Once validated as a training system for laparoscopic skills, the system is expected to overcome the current limitations of the FLS trainer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25159626      PMCID: PMC4344432          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Virtual reality computer simulation.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; J Rosenberg; E Pahle; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluating minimally invasive surgery training using low-cost mechanical simulations.

Authors:  G L Adrales; U B Chu; D B Witzke; M B Donnelly; D Hoskins; M J Mastrangelo; A Gandsas; A E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system.

Authors:  S A Fraser; D R Klassen; L S Feldman; G A Ghitulescu; D Stanbridge; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  High-level virtual reality simulator for endourologic procedures of lower urinary tract.

Authors:  Oliver Reich; Margarita Noll; Christian Gratzke; Alexander Bachmann; Raphaela Waidelich; Michael Seitz; Boris Schlenker; Reinhold Baumgartner; Alfons Hofstetter; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Housestaff performance is improved by participation in a laparoscopic skills curriculum.

Authors:  Thomas W Powers; Kenric M Murayama; Mark Toyama; Sarah Murphy; Ervin W Denham; Anna M Derossis; Raymond J Joehl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS: are we ready for skills assessment using simulators?

Authors:  S Maithel; R Sierra; J Korndorffer; P Neumann; S Dawson; M Callery; D Jones; D Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  8 in total

1.  Achieving Interface and Environment Fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Helena Mentis; Amie Miller; Woojin Ahn; Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.632

2.  Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Woojin Ahn; Clairice Cooper; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer.

Authors:  Venkata Arikatla; Sam Horvath; Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Suvranu De; Steve Schwaitzberg; Andinet Enquobahrie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.

Authors:  Ali M Linsk; Kimberley R Monden; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A machine learning approach to predict surgical learning curves.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Gao; Uwe Kruger; Xavier Intes; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Objective assessment of surgical skill transfer using non-invasive brain imaging.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Uwe Kruger; Clairice A Cooper; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Xavier Intes; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Functional Brain Imaging Reliably Predicts Bimanual Motor Skill Performance in a Standardized Surgical Task.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Gao; Pingkun Yan; Uwe Kruger; Lora Cavuoto; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De; Xavier Intes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.756

8.  Functional brain connectivity related to surgical skill dexterity in physical and virtual simulation environments.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Anil Kamat; Yuanyuan Gao; Meryem Yucel; Denise Gee; Clairice Cooper; Steven Schwaitzberg; Xavier Intes; Anirban Dutta; Suvranu De
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.593

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.