Literature DB >> 12368674

Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Neal E Seymour1, Anthony G Gallagher, Sanziana A Roman, Michael K O'Brien, Vipin K Bansal, Dana K Andersen, Richard M Satava.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that virtual reality (VR) training transfers technical skills to the operating room (OR) environment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of VR surgical simulation to train skills and reduce error risk in the OR has never been demonstrated in a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
METHODS: Sixteen surgical residents (PGY 1-4) had baseline psychomotor abilities assessed, then were randomized to either VR training (MIST VR simulator diathermy task) until expert criterion levels established by experienced laparoscopists were achieved (n = 8), or control non-VR-trained (n = 8). All subjects performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an attending surgeon blinded to training status. Videotapes of gallbladder dissection were reviewed independently by two investigators blinded to subject identity and training, and scored for eight predefined errors for each procedure minute (interrater reliability of error assessment r > 0.80).
RESULTS: No differences in baseline assessments were found between groups. Gallbladder dissection was 29% faster for VR-trained residents. Non-VR-trained residents were nine times more likely to transiently fail to make progress (P <.007, Mann-Whitney test) and five times more likely to injure the gallbladder or burn nontarget tissue (chi-square = 4.27, P <.04). Mean errors were six times less likely to occur in the VR-trained group (1.19 vs. 7.38 errors per case; P <.008, Mann-Whitney test).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of VR surgical simulation to reach specific target criteria significantly improved the OR performance of residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This validation of transfer of training skills from VR to OR sets the stage for more sophisticated uses of VR in assessment, training, error reduction, and certification of surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368674      PMCID: PMC1422600          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T R Eubanks; R H Clements; D Pohl; N Williams; D C Schaad; S Horgan; C Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Measurement and modelling of perceived slant in surfaces represented by freely viewed line drawings.

Authors:  R Cowie
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; K Richie; N McClure; J McGuigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

5.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club.

Authors:  M J Moore; C L Bennett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition.

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; K McGlade; N McClure
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of Defense.

Authors:  D C Wherry; C G Rob; M R Marohn; N M Rich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-06
View more
  497 in total

1.  Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer.

Authors:  Mathilde Maagaard; Jette Led Sorensen; Jeanett Oestergaard; Torur Dalsgaard; Teodor P Grantcharov; Bent S Ottesen; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.

Authors:  L Chang; R M Satava; C A Pellegrini; M N Sinanan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; David A McClusky; Andrew B Lederman; Anthony G Gallagher; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Feudner; Corinna Engel; Irmingard M Neuhann; Katrin Petermeier; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.

Authors:  A Chellali; L Zhang; G Sankaranarayanan; V S Arikatla; W Ahn; A Derevianko; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; M DeMoya; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Simulation in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Henry B Colaço; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.