Literature DB >> 16772789

Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Pamela B Andreatta1, Derek T Woodrum, John D Birkmeyer, Rajani K Yellamanchilli, Gerard M Doherty, Paul G Gauger, Rebecca M Minter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if prior training on the LapMentor laparoscopic simulator leads to improved performance of basic laparoscopic skills in the animate operating room environment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous influences have led to the development of computer-aided laparoscopic simulators: a need for greater efficiency in training, the unique and complex nature of laparoscopic surgery, and the increasing demand that surgeons demonstrate competence before proceeding to the operating room. The LapMentor simulator is expensive, however, and its use must be validated and justified prior to implementation into surgical training programs.
METHODS: Nineteen surgical interns were randomized to training on the LapMentor laparoscopic simulator (n = 10) or to a control group (no simulator training, n = 9). Subjects randomized to the LapMentor trained to expert criterion levels 2 consecutive times on 6 designated basic skills modules. All subjects then completed a series of laparoscopic exercises in a live porcine model, and performance was assessed independently by 2 blinded reviewers. Time, accuracy rates, and global assessments of performance were recorded with an interrater reliability between reviewers of 0.99.
RESULTS: LapMentor trained interns completed the 30 degrees camera navigation exercise in significantly less time than control interns (166 +/- 52 vs. 220 +/- 39 seconds, P < 0.05); they also achieved higher accuracy rates in identifying the required objects with the laparoscope (96% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 15%, P < 0.05). Similarly, on the two-handed object transfer exercise, task completion time for LapMentor trained versus control interns was 130 +/- 23 versus 184 +/- 43 seconds (P < 0.01) with an accuracy rate of 98% +/- 5% versus 80% +/- 13% (P < 0.001). Additionally, LapMentor trained interns outperformed control subjects with regard to camera navigation skills, efficiency of motion, optimal instrument handling, perceptual ability, and performance of safe electrocautery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that prior training on the LapMentor laparoscopic simulator leads to improved resident performance of basic skills in the animate operating room environment. This work marks the first prospective, randomized evaluation of the LapMentor simulator, and provides evidence that LapMentor training may lead to improved operating room performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16772789      PMCID: PMC1570578          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000219641.79092.e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; N McClure
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room.

Authors:  A Hyltander; E Liljegren; P H Rhodin; H Lönroth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Edward D Matsumoto; Stanley J Hamstra; Sidney B Radomski; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Linda Bardram; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  G M Fried; A M Derossis; J Bothwell; H H Sigman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course--improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J J Jakimowicz; I A M J Broeders; L N L Tseng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Amitai Ziv; Paul Root Wolpe; Stephen D Small; Shimon Glick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  First do no harm: preserving patient safety without sacrificing procedural education.

Authors:  Diane B Wayne; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-12

3.  The effect of simulation in improving students' performance in laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Azzam S Al-Kadi; Tyrone Donnon; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Philip Mitchell; Estifanos Debru; Neal Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; José Luis Moyano-Cuevas; José Blas Pagador; Silvia Enciso-Sanz; Patricia Sánchez-González; Enrique J Gómez-Aguilera; Jesús Usón-Gargallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effects of virtual reality simulator training method and observational learning on surgical performance.

Authors:  Christopher W Snyder; Marianne J Vandromme; Sharon L Tyra; John R Porterfield; Ronald H Clements; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Construct, content and face validity of the camera handling trainer (CHT): a new E-BLUS training task for 30° laparoscope navigation skills.

Authors:  Domenico Veneziano; Andrea Minervini; John Beatty; Paolo Fornara; Ali Gozen; Francesco Greco; J F Langenhuijsen; Luca Lunelli; Deirdre Overgaauw; Jens Rassweiler; Bernardo Rocco; Rafael Sanchez Salas; Shahrokh Shariat; Robert M Sweet; Giuseppe Simone; Christopher Springer; Agostino Tuccio; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Peter Weibl; Pietro Cozzupoli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Using Simulation Education With Deliberate Practice to Teach Leadership and Resource Management Skills to Senior Resident Code Leaders.

Authors:  Amanda R Burden; Erin W Pukenas; Edward R Deal; Douglas B Coursin; Gregory M Dodson; Gregory W Staman; Irwin Gratz; Marc C Torjman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

9.  FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill.

Authors:  A L McCluney; M C Vassiliou; P A Kaneva; J Cao; D D Stanbridge; L S Feldman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Simulation in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Henry B Colaço; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.