Literature DB >> 16648018

Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Elspeth M McDougall1, Federico A Corica, John R Boker, Leandro G Sala, Gabriela Stoliar, James F Borin, Frank T Chu, Ralph V Clayman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present initial data on the construct, content, and face validity of the LAPMentor (Simbionix), virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical students (MS), residents and fellows (R/F), and experienced laparoscopic surgeons (ES), with < 30 laparoscopic cases per year (ES<30) and those with > 30 laparoscopic cases per year (ES>30), were tested on 9 basic skill tasks (SK) including manipulation of 0-degree and 30-degree cameras (SK1, SK2), eye-hand coordination (SK3), clipping (SK4), grasping and clipping (SK5), two-handed maneuvers (SK6), cutting (SK7), fulguration (SK8), and object-translocation (SK9).
RESULTS: Mean MS (n=23), R/F (n=24), ES<30 (n=26), and ES>30 (n=30) ages were 26 years (range 21 to 32 years), 31 years (range 27 to 39 years), 49 years (range 31 to 70 years) and 47 years (range 34 to 69 years), respectively. In the lower level skill tasks (SK3, SK4, SK5, and SK6) the ES>30, ES<30, and R/F had similar scores, but were all substantially better than the MS scores. In the higher level skill tasks (SK7, SK8, and SK9), the ES>30 scores tended to be better than the R/F and ES<30, which were similar, and these, in turn, were markedly better than the MS. The ES>30 had notably higher SK8 scores than the R/F and ES<30, who had similar scores, and these had notably better scores than the MS.
CONCLUSIONS: The noncamera skills (SK3 to 9) of the LAPMentor surgical simulator can distinguish between laparoscopically naive and ES. SK8 showed the highest level of construct validity, by accurately differentiating among the MS, R/F, ES<30 and ES>30.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648018     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  39 in total

1.  Laparoscopic warm-up exercises improve performance of senior-level trainees during laparoscopic renal surgery.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Phillip Mucksavage; David C Kerbl; Kathryn E Osann; Howard N Winfield; Kanav Kahol; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic–laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to appendectomy.

Authors:  Sonja Gillen; Jörn Gröne; Fritz Knödgen; Petra Wolf; Michael Meyer; Helmut Friess; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Hubertus Feussner; Kai S Lehmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Positive correlation between motion analysis data on the LapMentor virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator and the results from videotape assessment of real laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Tadashi Matsuda; Elspeth M McDougall; Yoshinari Ono; Ryohei Hattori; Shiro Baba; Masatsugu Iwamura; Toshiro Terachi; Seiji Naito; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator.

Authors:  Aimin Zhang; Michael Hünerbein; Yiyang Dai; Peter M Schlag; Siegfried Beller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Time-efficient laparoscopic skills assessment using an augmented-reality simulator.

Authors:  J Adam Oostema; Matthew P Abdel; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Shohei Yamaguchi; Kozo Konishi; Takefumi Yasunaga; Daisuke Yoshida; Nao Kinjo; Kiichiro Kobayashi; Satoshi Ieiri; Ken Okazaki; Hideaki Nakashima; Kazuo Tanoue; Yoshihiko Maehara; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Improved nondominant hand performance on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator after playing the Nintendo Wii.

Authors:  Kellie K Middleton; Travis Hamilton; Pei-Chien Tsai; Dana B Middleton; John L Falcone; Giselle Hamad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Sandra L de Montbrun; Helen Macrae
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

10.  Surgeon-Authored Virtual Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Module Is Judged Effective and Preferred Over Traditional Teaching Tools.

Authors:  Sergei Kurenov; Juan Cendan; Saleh Dindar; Kristopher Attwood; James Hassett; Ruth Nawotniak; Gregory Cherr; William G Cance; Jörg Peters
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.058

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.