Literature DB >> 16252077

Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

F J Carter1, M P Schijven, R Aggarwal, T Grantcharov, N K Francis, G B Hanna, J J Jakimowicz.   

Abstract

The Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes is a newly formed sub-group of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES). This work group undertook a review of validation evidence for surgical simulators and the resulting consensus is presented in this article. Using clinical guidelines criteria, the evidence for validation for six different simulators was rated and subsequently translated to a level of recommendation for each system. The simulators could be divided into two basic types; systems for laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selection of simulators for inclusion in this consensus was based on their availability and relatively widespread usage as of July 2004. Whilst level 2 recommendations were achieved for a few systems, it was clear that there was an overall lack of published validation studies with rigorous experimental methodology. Since the consensus meeting, there have been a number of new articles, system upgrades and new devices available. The work group intends to update these consensus guidelines on a regular basis, with the resulting article available on the EAES website (http://www.eaes-eur.org ).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16252077     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0384-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement.

Authors:  J B Prystowsky; G Regehr; D A Rogers; J P Loan; L L Hiemenz; K M Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; David A McClusky; Andrew B Lederman; Anthony G Gallagher; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  A review of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  E J Andrews; H P Redmond
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy.

Authors:  S Adamsen; P M Funch-Jensen; A M Drewes; J Rosenberg; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy.

Authors:  Lars Enochsson; Bengt Isaksson; René Tour; Ann Kjellin; Leif Hedman; Torsten Wredmark; Li Tsai-Felländer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Spatial awareness in urologists: are they different?

Authors:  H J Gallagher; J D Allan; D A Tolley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.

Authors:  Katherine Fairhurst; Andrew Strickland; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Andrew Strickland; Katherine Fairhurst; Chris Lauder; Peter Hewett; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel J Kiely; Walter H Gotlieb; Susie Lau; Xing Zeng; Vanessa Samouelian; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Helena Zakrzewski; Sonya Brin; Shannon A Fraser; Pira Korsieporn; Laura Drudi; Joshua Z Press
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-16

6.  Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?

Authors:  K W van Dongen; E Tournoij; D C van der Zee; M P Schijven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Svend Schulze; Viggo B Kristiansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Fawaz Torab; Sonja N Buzink; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Role of simulation in training the next generation of endoscopists.

Authors:  Simon C Blackburn; Stephen J Griffin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.