Literature DB >> 30324462

Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer.

Venkata Arikatla1, Sam Horvath2, Yaoyu Fu3, Lora Cavuoto3, Suvranu De4, Steve Schwaitzberg5, Andinet Enquobahrie2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) trainer box, which is now established as a standard for evaluating minimally invasive surgical skills, consists of five tasks: peg transfer, pattern cutting, ligation, intra- and extracorporeal suturing. Virtual simulators of these tasks have been developed and validated as part of the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST) (Arikatla et al. in Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 10:344-355, 2014; Zhang et al. in Surg Endosc 27(10):3603-3615, 2013; Sankaranarayanan et al. in J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20(2):153-157, 2010; Qi et al. J Biomed Inform 75:48-62, 2017). The virtual task trainers have many advantages including automatic real-time objective scoring, reduced costs, and eliminating human proctors. In this paper, we extend VBLaST by adding two camera navigation system tasks: (a) pattern matching and (b) path tracing.
METHODS: A comprehensive camera navigation simulator with two virtual tasks, simplified and cheaper hardware interface (compared to the prior version of VBLaST), graphical user interface, and automated metrics has been designed and developed. Face validity of the system is tested with medical students and residents from the University at Buffalo's medical school.
RESULTS: The subjects rated the simulator highly in all aspects including its usefulness in training to center the target and to teach sizing skills. The quality and usefulness of the force feedback scored the lowest at 2.62.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Camera navigation; Face validity; Laparoscopy; Surgical training; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30324462      PMCID: PMC6465181          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6476-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; N McClure
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Randy Haluck; Tai Pham; J Bruce Dunne; Timothy Reinke; Sarah Markley; James R Korndorffer; Paul Arellano; Daniel B Jones; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Virtual-reality training improves angled telescope skills in novice laparoscopists.

Authors:  Sabha Ganai; Joseph A Donroe; Myron R St Louis; Giavonni M Lewis; Neal E Seymour
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator.

Authors:  Aimin Zhang; Michael Hünerbein; Yiyang Dai; Peter M Schlag; Siegfried Beller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual interactive suturing for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS).

Authors:  Di Qi; Karthikeyan Panneerselvam; Woojin Ahn; Venkata Arikatla; Andinet Enquobahrie; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Impact of visual-spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training.

Authors:  Paul J Roch; Henriette M Rangnick; Julia A Brzoska; Laura Benner; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Philip C Müller; Hannes G Kenngott; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.

Authors:  Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Amine Chellali; Suvranu De; G L Caroline; John Hwabejire; Marc DeMoya; Steven Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection.

Authors:  Tsafrir Vanounou; Jennifer L Steel; Kevin Tri Nguyen; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Henry Lin; Venkata S Arikatla; Maureen Mulcare; Likun Zhang; Alexandre Derevianko; Robert Lim; David Fobert; Caroline Cao; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Cecilia Nilsson; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Mikkel Westen; Morten Stadeager; Bent Ottesen; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Advancing Simulation-Based Orthopaedic Surgical Skills Training: An Analysis of the Challenges to Implementation.

Authors:  Kivanc Atesok; Shepard Hurwitz; Donald D Anderson; Richard Satava; Geb W Thomas; Ted Tufescu; Michael J Heffernan; Efstathios Papavassiliou; Steven Theiss; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-09-02

2.  Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  F Huettl; H Lang; M Paschold; F Watzka; N Wachter; B Hensel; W Kneist; Tobias Huber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.