BACKGROUND: Before surgical simulators can be implemented for assessment of surgical training, their construct validity should be assessed. METHODS: Nine novices (NOV), nine medical students (MS), and nine residents (RES) underwent a laparoscopic skills training on the virtual reality (VR) simulator Lap Mentor. Assessment of laparoscopic skill was based on parameters measured by the computer system before and after training. RESULTS: Significant difference existed between RES and NOV at seven of nine tasks before training on the VR simulator. After the training in some tasks significant differences were observed between the experienced group (RES) and the nonexperienced groups (MS and NOV) or between medical groups (RES and MS) and nonmedical group (NOV). CONCLUSIONS: Performance parameters of the Lap-Mentor can be used to distinguish between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience.
BACKGROUND: Before surgical simulators can be implemented for assessment of surgical training, their construct validity should be assessed. METHODS: Nine novices (NOV), nine medical students (MS), and nine residents (RES) underwent a laparoscopic skills training on the virtual reality (VR) simulator Lap Mentor. Assessment of laparoscopic skill was based on parameters measured by the computer system before and after training. RESULTS: Significant difference existed between RES and NOV at seven of nine tasks before training on the VR simulator. After the training in some tasks significant differences were observed between the experienced group (RES) and the nonexperienced groups (MS and NOV) or between medical groups (RES and MS) and nonmedical group (NOV). CONCLUSIONS: Performance parameters of the Lap-Mentor can be used to distinguish between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience.
Authors: Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Howard Champion; Gerald Higgins; Marvin P Fried; Gerald Moses; C Daniel Smith; Richard M Satava Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Elspeth M McDougall; Federico A Corica; John R Boker; Leandro G Sala; Gabriela Stoliar; James F Borin; Frank T Chu; Ralph V Clayman Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: K R Van Sickle; E M Ritter; D A McClusky; A Lederman; M Baghai; A G Gallagher; C D Smith Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-11-16 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Derek T Woodrum; Pamela B Andreatta; Rajani K Yellamanchilli; Lauren Feryus; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: A Chellali; W Ahn; G Sankaranarayanan; J T Flinn; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; Suvranu De; C G L Cao Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: J L Moyano-Cuevas; F M Sánchez-Margallo; L F Sánchez-Peralta; J B Pagador; S Enciso; P Sánchez-González; E J Gómez-Aguilera; J Usón-Gargallo Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2011-04-17 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Marc L Schmidt; Erica Wennberg; Carly R Garrow; Sang Paik; Laura Benner; Marlies P Schijven; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: A Chellali; L Zhang; G Sankaranarayanan; V S Arikatla; W Ahn; A Derevianko; S D Schwaitzberg; D B Jones; M DeMoya; C G L Cao Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-04-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mark Wilson; John McGrath; Samuel Vine; James Brewer; David Defriend; Richard Masters Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 4.584