Literature DB >> 12582752

Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

M Schijven1, J Jakimowicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to establish construct validity of the Xitact LS500, a virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy simulator. The primary research statement is: "The clip-and-cut task on the Xitact LS500 virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy simulator mimics the surgical procedure of the clipping and cutting of the cystic duct and artery during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy adequately."
METHODS: According to the level of experience of the surgeon, an "expert group opinion" was formed resulting from 37 surgeons having performed over 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and a "novice group opinion" was formed resulting of 37 surgeons having no experience at all with performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Participants received an instructed hands-on "tour" on the Xitact simulator and performed three formal simulation runs.
RESULTS: The "novice group" is younger and more surgeons are female. Performance scores in the "expert" group are significantly higher on the second (p value 0.011) and third (p value 0.005) run, compared to the novices' scores. Experts are significantly faster on completion of all three runs. There is an increase in score over runs in both groups, which is statistically significant in the "expert group." Less than one-third of surgeons in either group are able to correctly predict their performance score as generated by Xitact. Both "experts" and "novices" feel it is useful to train with Xitact LS500 in the surgical curriculum.
CONCLUSIONS: Three hypotheses, formulated to operationalize the primary research statement, could be answered affirmatively. Although further validation studies are needed, the Xitact LS500 simulator seems to be able to discriminate between expert and novice surgeons in this research setting, and thus the construct for this setting is considered to be valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12582752     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Validity and reliability: basic research concepts.

Authors:  J D Whitney
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.741

2.  A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement.

Authors:  J B Prystowsky; G Regehr; D A Rogers; J P Loan; L L Hiemenz; K M Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Validity of surgical simulation for the assessment of operative skill.

Authors:  A M Paisley; P J Baldwin; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Exporting a technical skills evaluation technology to other sites.

Authors:  G Ault; R Reznick; H MacRae; W Leadbetter; D DaRosa; R Joehl; J Peters; G Regehr
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  MIST VR: a virtual reality trainer for laparoscopic surgery assesses performance.

Authors:  M S Wilson; A Middlebrook; C Sutton; R Stone; R F McCloy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Measurement reliability and validity.

Authors:  K B Gaberson
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 0.676

7.  Teaching and testing technical skills.

Authors:  R K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Coleman; C C Nduka; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition.

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; K McGlade; N McClure
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  41 in total

1.  The intercollegiate Basic Surgical Skills Course.

Authors:  M Schijven; R Klaassen; J Jakimowicz; O T Terpstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimal-access surgery training in the Netherlands: a survey among residents-in-training for general surgery.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J T M Berlage; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; T Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course--improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J J Jakimowicz; I A M J Broeders; L N L Tseng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator reflects clinical experience in German surgeons.

Authors:  C Langelotz; M Kilian; C Paul; W Schwenk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee's talent in laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  R Rosenthal; W A Gantert; D Scheidegger; D Oertli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The influence of different training schedules on the learning of psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; R P J van Wijk; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.