Literature DB >> 20559831

Birmingham hip resurfacing: five to eight year results.

Aleksi Reito1, Timo Puolakka, Jorma Pajamäki.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacings have been performed in our hospital since May 2001, and in this retrospective study, we analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of the first 144 prostheses (126 patients). One hundred and seven patients have visited our hospital for regular follow-up examination; 16 are not in regular follow-up and were sent a Harris Hip Score (HHS) questionnaire. Three patients live abroad. Mean follow-up was six years. One patient was lost during follow-up. Four prostheses have been revised. The six year cumulative survival rate was 96.7%. Two female patients required revision for aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vascular associated lesions (ALVAL) and two male patients due for femoral head necrosis. Both reoperated female patients had cup inclination > 60°. Mean HHS in the follow-up was 95.3, and mean patient satisfaction 2.53 on a scale 0-3. Neck thinning > 10% was seen in seven hips and impingement in 12 hips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20559831      PMCID: PMC3167436          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1066-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.

Authors:  B Ollivere; C Darrah; T Barker; J Nolan; M J Porteous
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

2.  Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G Grammatopolous; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

Review 3.  Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Sarah E Connelly; Susan M Odum; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason; John L Masonis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results.

Authors:  Munir Khan; Jan-Herman Kuiper; Die Edwards; Eric Robinson; James B Richardson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  A J Hart; S Sabah; J Henckel; A Lewis; J Cobb; B Sampson; A Mitchell; J A Skinner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-06

8.  Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties.

Authors:  D J Langton; A P Sprowson; T J Joyce; M Reed; I Carluke; P Partington; A V F Nargol
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-10

9.  Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Robert-Tobias Steffen; Pedro R Foguet; Stephen J Krikler; Roger Gundle; David J Beard; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Paul Shim; Kamlajeet Banga
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  12 in total

1.  Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael M Morlock; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm following Birmingham hip resurfacing: an important differential diagnosis for a periarticular cystic mass.

Authors:  M S Thomas; J N O'Hara; A M Davies; Steven L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Correlation between groin pain and cup design of hip-resurfacing implants: a prospective study.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Erwan Pansard; Reda Ouahes; Henri Migaud; Cyril Delay; Laurent Vasseur
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Antti Paakkala; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

Authors:  M C M Klotz; S J Breusch; M Hassenpflug; R G Bitsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Socio-economic impact of Birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Malek; Munawar Hashmi; James P Holland
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Regis Pailhe; Gulraj S Matharu; Akash Sharma; Paul B Pynsent; Ronan B Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.