Literature DB >> 20730585

Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Charles A Willis-Owen1, Henry D Atkinson, Roger D Oakeshott.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing is an effective treatment modality for arthritis of the hip in carefully selected patients; however, its use remains controversial due to its higher revision rates compared with conventional total hip replacement surgery. The most frequent reason for revision is femoral neck fracture, and preoperative bone mineral density is an important factor when considering the option of hip resurfacing. Whilst reduction in bone mineral density following total hip replacement is well documented, little is known about the long-term changes in femoral neck bone mineral density after hip resurfacing. We followed 15 patients (ten male and five female) who underwent unilateral hip resurfacing for osteoarthritis with standardised dual energy X-ray absorbiometry scans at two weeks, three months, one year, two years and five years postoperatively to determine changes in the femoral neck bone mineral density. Both males and females initially had decreases in bone mineral density at three months postoperatively, but had gradual mean increases to 119% of their initial measurements by five years. This study demonstrates that femoral neck bone mineral density increases after hip resurfacing and that this increase continues for at least five years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20730585      PMCID: PMC3167457          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1115-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  32 in total

Review 1.  Looking beyond bone mineral density : Imaging assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Klaus Engelke; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?

Authors:  S Krüger; P Y Zambelli; P-F Leyvraz; B M Jolles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy.

Authors:  C Schnurr; J W P Michael; P Eysel; D P König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Ten different hip resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material properties.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Jennifer A Kleinhans; Michael Menge; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens.

Authors:  Michael M Morlock; Nick Bishop; Jozef Zustin; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael Amling
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Sarah E Connelly; Susan M Odum; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason; John L Masonis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.

Authors:  T S Wik; P O Østbyhaug; J Klaksvik; A Aamodt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

Review 8.  Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Ryan M Nunley; Stephen J Raterman; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; S Malak; I A Anderson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is the increase in bone mineral density after hip resurfacing uniform across the femoral neck?

Authors:  Ramprasad Kancherla; Arun Kannan; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What should I expect from my recalled Adept Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Silvio Terrando; Andrea Sambri; Giuseppe Tedesco; Antonio Mazzotti; Barbara Bordini; Dalila De Pasquale; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.