Literature DB >> 22622658

[Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

M C M Klotz1, S J Breusch, M Hassenpflug, R G Bitsch.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing is a common method for therapy of coxarthritis and is currently under discussion. The aim of this study was to analyze hip resurfacing follow-up studies with more than 5 years follow-up time. A total of 17 studies which matched the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The survival rate after 5-6 years was 96.3%, after 7-8 years 93.8% and after 9-10 years 90%. Young men with primary coxarthritis and surgery by an experienced surgeon showed the best results. The main causes for revision were aseptic loosening with 34.4% and fracture of the proximal femur with 31.9%. Dislocation as a cause for revision was rare and occurred in 2.8% of all cases. Hip resurfacing showed worse results than conventional hip arthroplasty. The risk for complications was high especially for women, with small prostheses and in patients with suboptimal positioning of the prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622658     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-1899-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  42 in total

1.  The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Patricia A Campbell; Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A J Shimmin; W L Walter; C Esposito
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-04

3.  Hip resurfacing through a modified anterolateral approach, as compared with the Ganz trochanteric flip osteotomy: a two year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rashid M Khan; Gillian Cooper; Jonathan B Hull
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  National joint replacement registry.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2009-10

5.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.

Authors:  R T Steffen; H P Pandit; J Palan; D J Beard; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-04

6.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.

Authors:  D J Langton; T J Joyce; S S Jameson; J Lord; M Van Orsouw; J P Holland; A V F Nargol; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

7.  The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.

Authors:  C B Hing; D L Back; M Bailey; D A Young; R E Dalziel; A J Shimmin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

8.  Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head.

Authors:  M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Shimmin; Paul E Beaulé; Pat Campbell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  J Daniel; H Ziaee; A Kamali; C Pradhan; T Band; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Femoral neck prostheses: A systematic analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Stefanos Tsitlakidis; Fabian Westhauser; Axel Horsch; Nicholas Beckmann; Rudi Bitsch; Matthias Klotz
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2019-09-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.