Literature DB >> 19651828

Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.

B Ollivere1, C Darrah, T Barker, J Nolan, M J Porteous.   

Abstract

The rate and mode of early failure in 463 Birmingham hip resurfacings in a two-centre, multisurgeon series were examined. Of the 463 patients two have died and three were lost to follow-up. The mean radiological and clinical follow-up was for 43 months (6 to 90). We have revised 13 resurfacings (2.8%) including seven for pain, three for fracture, two for dislocation and another for sepsis. Of these, nine had macroscopic and histological evidence of metallosis. The survival at five years was 95.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 96.8) for revision for all causes and 96.9% (95% CI 95.5 to 98.3) for metallosis. The rate of metallosis related revision was 3.1% at five years. Risk factors for metallosis were female gender, a small femoral component, a high abduction angle and obesity. We do not advocate the use of the Birmingham Hip resurfacing procedure in patients with these risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651828     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.21701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  50 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: a cause of runaway wear and early failure.

Authors:  William L Griffin; Christopher J Nanson; Bryan D Springer; Matthew A Davies; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Failure of a metal on metal hip prosthesis presenting as a destructive soft tissue mass due to ALVAL.

Authors:  Jonathan R B Hutt; Constant Busch; Rod A Hughes
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Metallosis following silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasties with grommets: case report.

Authors:  Imran K Choudhry; Joyce M Wilson; Peter J Stern
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-06

6.  Are leg length and hip offset comparable after hip resurfacing and cementless total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Patel; R R Thakrar; J Bhamra; F Hossain; M Tengrootenhuysen; F S Haddad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Mediators of the inflammatory response to joint replacement devices.

Authors:  Neil Cobelli; Brian Scharf; Giovanna M Crisi; John Hardin; Laura Santambrogio
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller; Gareth H Prosser; Stephen E Graves; David C Davidson; Tyman E Stanford
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Catastrophic failure due to aggressive metallosis 4 years after hip resurfacing in a woman in her forties--a case report.

Authors:  Thord von Schewelov; Lennart Sanzén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips.

Authors:  Pat Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Scott Nelson; Karren Takamura; Koen De Smet; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.