Literature DB >> 21113593

Socio-economic impact of Birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years.

Ibrahim A Malek1, Munawar Hashmi, James P Holland.   

Abstract

Birmingham hip resurfacing is an attractive option for treatment of arthritis in young and active patients. The aim of this study was to assess the socio-economic impact of Birmingham hip resurfacing on their employment and work intensity at ten years. A cohort of 90 consecutive patients with 100 Birmingham hip resurfacing, performed by single surgeon, were reviewed prospectively. The mean age was 51 years at surgery. Prospective review was undertaken from surgery until the tenth post-operative year. Overall, 90% of patients were in the same employment following surgery. Two patients who were employed before surgery were unemployed. Three patients had to decrease their work intensity but were still employed. Three out of five disabled patients regained employment following surgery. Seventy-eight patients were able to continue their employment with no or minimal restriction. Birmingham hip resurfacing allows the majority of patients to continue their same employment at similar intensity ten years following surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113593      PMCID: PMC3174309          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1168-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey.

Authors:  T D Tennent; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Occupational capacity after hip replacement.

Authors:  J S Jensen; B Mathiesen; N Tvede
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1985-04

3.  Work disability before and after total hip arthroplasty. Assessment of effectiveness in reducing disability.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; W V Epstein; M Masem; W R Murray
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1984-04

4.  Birmingham hip resurfacing: five to eight year results.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Authors:  E A Lingard; K Muthumayandi; J P Holland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-12

6.  Activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. Is a 32-mm femoral head superior to a 26-mm head for improving daily activities?

Authors:  Isao Matsushita; Yuji Morita; Yoshiaki Ito; Ryuichi Gejo; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; David R Marker; Jonathan M Smith; Slif D Ulrich; Mike S McGrath
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.

Authors:  Vincent A Fowble; Mylene A dela Rosa; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2009

9.  Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; David R Marker; Mike S McGrath; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2009

10.  [Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study].

Authors:  M Lavigne; V Masse; J Girard; A G Roy; P A Vendittoli
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2008-04-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Regis Pailhe; Gulraj S Matharu; Akash Sharma; Paul B Pynsent; Ronan B Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Outcomes of birmingham hip resurfacing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Steve Karas
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03

5.  Preliminary report of clinical experience with metal-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Ronan B C Treacy; James P Holland; Joseph Daniel; Hena Ziaee; Derek J W McMinn
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.