Literature DB >> 19483225

The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

A J Hart1, S Sabah, J Henckel, A Lewis, J Cobb, B Sampson, A Mitchell, J A Skinner.   

Abstract

We carried out metal artefact-reduction MRI, three-dimensional CT measurement of the position of the component and inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis of cobalt and chromium levels in whole blood on 26 patients with unexplained pain following metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty. MRI showed periprosthetic lesions around 16 hips, with 14 collections of fluid and two soft-tissue masses. The lesions were seen in both men and women and in symptomatic and asymptomatic hips. Using three-dimensional CT, the median inclination of the acetabular component was found to be 55 degrees and its positioning was outside the Lewinnek safe zone in 13 of 16 cases. Using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry, the levels of blood metal ions tended to be higher in painful compared with well-functioning metal-on-metal hips. These three clinically useful investigations can help to determine the cause of failure of the implant, predict the need for future revision and aid the choice of revision prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19483225     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  58 in total

1.  The John Charnley Award: an accurate and extremely sensitive method to separate, display, and characterize wear debris: part 2: metal and ceramic particles.

Authors:  Fabrizio Billi; Paul Benya; Aaron Kavanaugh; John Adams; Harry McKellop; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The effects on bone cells of metal ions released from orthopaedic implants. A review.

Authors:  Valerio Sansone; Davide Pagani; Marco Melato
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-01

Review 4.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Radiology of the resurfaced hip.

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?

Authors:  Reshid Berber; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips.

Authors:  Pat Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Scott Nelson; Karren Takamura; Koen De Smet; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

Authors:  David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Aaron J Johnson; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36 mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program.

Authors:  Amit Atrey; Alister Hart; Nasir Hussain; Jonathon Waite; Andrew J Shepherd; Steve Young
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.