Literature DB >> 18834698

Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results.

Munir Khan1, Jan-Herman Kuiper, Die Edwards, Eric Robinson, James B Richardson.   

Abstract

Pioneering centers report excellent results of Birmingham resurfacing arthroplasty. Results from pioneering surgeons are not usually reproduced when implants are used at other centers. We therefore studied patients' satisfaction, postoperative hip function, and survival of Birmingham hip resurfacing in a group, operated by nonpioneering surgeons. The median first year postoperative Harris hip score was 95, and this score was sustained for a period of 8 years. The cumulative survival at 8 years was 95.7%. Most of the failures were in the first year; commonest cause of the first year failures was fracture of femoral neck. This complication is not seen as a substantial problem in the pioneering surgeons' studies. We therefore conclude that this complication is not related to the prosthesis and that its occurrence can be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18834698     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  24 in total

1.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Akash Sharma; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood; Muhannad Alkinj
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Avoiding short-term femoral neck fracture with imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Michael Olsen; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Birmingham hip resurfacing: five to eight year results.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Osteonecrosis following resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gösta Ullmark; Kent Sundgren; Jan Milbrink; Olle Nilsson; Jens Sörensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips.

Authors:  Pat Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Scott Nelson; Karren Takamura; Koen De Smet; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.