Literature DB >> 20049693

Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Enrique F Schisterman1, Albert Vexler, Sunni L Mumford, Neil J Perkins.   

Abstract

Evaluating biomarkers in epidemiological studies can be expensive and time consuming. Many investigators use techniques such as random sampling or pooling biospecimens in order to cut costs and save time on experiments. Commonly, analyses based on pooled data are strongly restricted by distributional assumptions that are challenging to validate because of the pooled biospecimens. Random sampling provides data that can be easily analyzed. However, random sampling methods are not optimal cost-efficient designs for estimating means. We propose and examine a cost-efficient hybrid design that involves taking a sample of both pooled and unpooled data in an optimal proportion in order to efficiently estimate the unknown parameters of the biomarker distribution. In addition, we find that this design can be used to estimate and account for different types of measurement and pooling error, without the need to collect validation data or repeated measurements. We show an example where application of the hybrid design leads to minimization of a given loss function based on variances of the estimators of the unknown parameters. Monte Carlo simulation and biomarker data from a study on coronary heart disease are used to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Published in 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20049693      PMCID: PMC2821989          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

Review 1.  The interpretation of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D E Shapiro
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Vitaly Fainberg; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The Youden Index and the optimal cut-point corrected for measurement error.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of comparative studies using microarrays.

Authors:  Shu-Dong Zhang; Timothy W Gant
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Efficient design and analysis of biospecimens with measurements subject to detection limit.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Receiver operating characteristic studies and measurement errors.

Authors:  M Coffin; S Sukhatme
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol.

Authors:  K Liu; J Stamler; A Dyer; J McKeever; P McKeever
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978

10.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Pooled biological specimens for human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Amy L Heffernan; Lesa L Aylward; Leisa-Maree L Toms; Peter D Sly; Matthew Macleod; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Estimation and testing based on data subject to measurement errors: from parametric to non-parametric likelihood methods.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Wan-Min Tsai; Yaakov Malinovsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Positing, fitting, and selecting regression models for pooled biomarker data.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Semiparametric regression models for a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Gamma models for estimating the odds ratio for a skewed biomarker measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model.

Authors:  Yaakov Malinovsky; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Assessment of skewed exposure in case-control studies with pooling.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Zhiwei Zhang; Aijun Ye; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Michelle Danaher; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The biomarker revolution.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Estimating the prevalence of transmitted HIV drug resistance using pooled samples.

Authors:  Mariel M Finucane; Christopher F Rowley; Christopher J Paciorek; Max Essex; Marcello Pagano
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.