Literature DB >> 10501649

The interpretation of diagnostic tests.

D E Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Laboratory diagnostic tests are central in the practice of modern medicine. Common uses include screening a specific population for evidence of disease and confirming or ruling out a tentative diagnosis in an individual patient. The interpretation of a diagnostic test result depends on both the ability of the test to distinguish diseased from nondiseased subjects and the particular characteristics of the patient and setting in which the test is being used. This article reviews statistical methodology for assessing laboratory diagnostic test accuracy and interpreting individual test results, with an emphasis on diagnostic tests that yield a continuous measurement. The article begins with a summary of basic concepts and terminology, then briefly discusses study design and reviews methods for assessing the accuracy of a single diagnostic test, comparing the accuracy of two or more diagnostic tests and interpreting individual test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10501649     DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  71 in total

Review 1.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Relationship among pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and atopy in children with clinically stable asthma.

Authors:  Eugene Yang; Woojung Kim; Byoung Chul Kwon; Sung Yeon Choi; Myung Hyun Sohn; Kyu-Earn Kim
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Peptidomic analysis of human peripheral monocytes persistently infected by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Birgit Krausse-Opatz; Annette Busmann; Harald Tammen; Christoph Menzel; Thomas Möhring; Nicolas Le Yondre; Cornelia Schmidt; Peter Schulz-Knappe; Henning Zeidler; Hartmut Selle; Lars Köhler
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Youden Index and the optimal threshold for markers with mass at zero.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser; Jessica Hu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The Constrained Network-Based Statistic: A New Level of Inference for Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Stephanie Noble; Dustin Scheinost
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2020-09-29

9.  Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong; Chin-Ying Lai; Albert Vexler
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.