Literature DB >> 17721905

Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Albert Vexler1, Enrique F Schisterman, Aiyi Liu.   

Abstract

Additive measurement errors and pooling design are objectively two different issues, which have been separately and extensively dealt with in the biostatistics literature. However, these topics usually correspond to problems of reconstructing a summand's distribution of the biomarker by the distribution of the convoluted observations. Thus, we associate the two issues into one stated problem. The integrated approach creates an opportunity to investigate new fields, e.g. a subject of pooling errors, issues regarding pooled data affected by measurement errors. To be specific, we consider the stated problem in the context of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis, which is the well-accepted tool for evaluating the ability of a biomarker to discriminate between two populations. The present paper considers a wide family of biospecimen distributions. In addition, applied assumptions, which are related to distribution functions of biomarkers, are mainly conditioned by the reconstructing problem. We propose and examine maximum likelihood techniques based on the following data: a biomarker with measurement error; pooled samples; and pooled samples with measurement error. The obtained methods are illustrated by applications to real data studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17721905      PMCID: PMC2761639          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

Review 1.  The interpretation of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D E Shapiro
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error.

Authors:  E F Schisterman; D Faraggi; B Reiser; M Trevisan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  ROC curve analysis for biomarkers based on pooled assessments.

Authors:  David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.

Authors:  K H Zou; W J Hall; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and non-normal data: an empirical study.

Authors:  M J Goddard; I Hinberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total
  16 in total

1.  Estimation and testing based on data subject to measurement errors: from parametric to non-parametric likelihood methods.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Wan-Min Tsai; Yaakov Malinovsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Regression models for group testing data with pool dilution effects.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model.

Authors:  Yaakov Malinovsky; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher McMahan; Colin Gallagher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Youden index and Associated Cut-points for Three Ordinal Diagnostic Groups.

Authors:  Jingqin Luo; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.118

7.  The biomarker revolution.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A maximum Likelihood Approach to Analyzing Incomplete Longitudinal Data in Mammary Tumor Development Experiments with Mice.

Authors:  Jihnhee Yu; Albert Vexler; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Sri Lankan J Appl Stat       Date:  2013-01-09

9.  Evaluations and comparisons of treatment effects based on best combinations of biomarkers with applications to biomedical studies.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Xiwei Chen; Jihnhee Yu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 1.479

10.  Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.

Authors:  Matthew T White; Sharon X Xie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.