Literature DB >> 25737248

Semiparametric regression models for a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling.

Emily M Mitchell, Robert H Lyles, Amita K Manatunga, Enrique F Schisterman.   

Abstract

Pooling specimens prior to performing laboratory assays has various benefits. Pooling can help to reduce cost, preserve irreplaceable specimens, meet minimal volume requirements for certain lab tests, and even reduce information loss when a limit of detection is present. Regardless of the motivation for pooling, appropriate analytical techniques must be applied in order to obtain valid inference from composite specimens. When biomarkers are treated as the outcome in a regression model, techniques applicable to individually measured specimens may not be valid when measurements are taken from pooled specimens, particularly when the biomarker is positive and right skewed. In this paper, we propose a novel semiparametric estimation method based on an adaptation of the quasi-likelihood approach that can be applied to a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling. We use simulation studies to compare this method with an existing estimation technique that provides valid estimates only when pools are formed from specimens with identical predictor values. Simulation results and analysis of a motivating example demonstrate that, when appropriate estimation techniques are applied to strategically formed pools, valid and efficient estimation of the regression coefficients can be achieved.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  biomarkers; design; pooled specimens; quasi-likelihood; skewness; statistical analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25737248      PMCID: PMC4371765          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  13 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model.

Authors:  Yaakov Malinovsky; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Assessment of skewed exposure in case-control studies with pooling.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Zhiwei Zhang; Aijun Ye; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Likelihood-based methods for regression analysis with binary exposure status assessed by pooling.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Li Tang; Ji Lin; Zhiwei Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Michelle Danaher; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Mini-pool screening by nucleic acid testing for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV: preliminary results.

Authors:  M S Cardoso; K Koerner; B Kubanek
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A highly efficient design strategy for regression with outcome pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants and Birth Characteristics: The Upstate KIDS Study.

Authors:  Griffith A Bell; Neil Perkins; Germaine M Buck Louis; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Erin M Bell; Chongjing Gao; Edwina H Yeung
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Estimating relative risk of a log-transformed exposure measured in pools.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Torie C Plowden; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Determination of Varying Group Sizes for Pooling Procedure.

Authors:  Wenjun Xiong; Hongyu Lu; Juan Ding
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.