Literature DB >> 24192659

Pooled biological specimens for human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: opportunities and limitations.

Amy L Heffernan1, Lesa L Aylward2, Leisa-Maree L Toms3, Peter D Sly4, Matthew Macleod5, Jochen F Mueller1.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring has become the "gold standard" in assessing chemical exposures, and has an important role in risk assessment. The pooling of biological specimens-combining multiple individual specimens into a single sample-can be used in biomonitoring studies to monitor levels of exposure and identify exposure trends or to identify susceptible populations in a cost-effective manner. Pooled samples provide an estimate of central tendency and may also reveal information about variation within the population. The development of a pooling strategy requires careful consideration of the type and number of samples collected, the number of pools required and the number of specimens to combine per pool in order to maximise the type and robustness of the data. Creative pooling strategies can be used to explore exposure-outcome associations, and extrapolation from other larger studies can be useful in identifying elevated exposures in specific individuals. The use of pooled specimens is advantageous as it saves significantly on analytical costs, may reduce the time and resources required for recruitment and, in certain circumstances, allows quantification of samples approaching the limit of detection. In addition, the use of pooled samples can provide population estimates while avoiding ethical difficulties that may be associated with reporting individual results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24192659     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2013.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  37 in total

1.  Uses and issues of biomonitoring.

Authors:  Larry L Needham; Antonia M Calafat; Dana B Barr
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Past, present, and future of environmental specimen banks.

Authors:  Akio Koizumi; Kouji H Harada; Kayoko Inoue; Toshiaki Hitomi; Hye-Ran Yang; Chan-Seok Moon; Peiyu Wang; Nguyen Ngoc Hung; Takao Watanabe; Shinichiro Shimbo; Masayuki Ikeda
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 4.  Human biomonitoring: state of the art.

Authors:  Jürgen Angerer; Ulrich Ewers; Michael Wilhelm
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 5.  Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.

Authors:  S M Hays; R A Becker; H W Leung; L L Aylward; D W Pyatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Environmental surveys, specimen bank and health related environmental monitoring in Germany.

Authors:  Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Kerstin Becker; André Conrad; Christa Schröter-Kermani; Christine Schulz; Margarete Seiwert
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Total blood mercury concentrations in the U.S. population: 1999-2006.

Authors:  Kathleen L Caldwell; Mary E Mortensen; Robert L Jones; Samuel P Caudill; John D Osterloh
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 8.  Health, wealth, and air pollution: advancing theory and methods.

Authors:  Marie S O'Neill; Michael Jerrett; Ichiro Kawachi; Jonathan I Levy; Aaron J Cohen; Nelson Gouveia; Paul Wilkinson; Tony Fletcher; Luis Cifuentes; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: a survey of scientists and study participants.

Authors:  Rachel Morello-Frosch; Julia Green Brody; Phil Brown; Rebecca Gasior Altman; Ruthann A Rudel; Carla Pérez
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Banking of human tissue for biomonitoring and exposure assessment: utility for environmental epidemiology and surveillance.

Authors:  L R Goldman; H Anton-Culver; M Kharrazi; E Blake
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  23 in total

1.  Case-control data analysis for randomly pooled biomarkers.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Bayesian regression for group testing data.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Timothy E Hanson; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Positing, fitting, and selecting regression models for pooled biomarker data.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Exposure assessment of chemical hazards in pork meat, liver, and kidney, and health impact implication in Hung Yen and Nghe An provinces, Vietnam.

Authors:  Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh; Dang Xuan Sinh; Pham Duc Phuc; Tran Thi Ngan; Chu Van Tuat; Delia Grace; Fred Unger; Hung Nguyen-Viet
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Variability of urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites during pregnancy in first morning voids and pooled samples.

Authors:  Hyeong-Moo Shin; Deborah H Bennett; Jacqueline Barkoski; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Daniel Tancredi; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Estimating relative risk of a log-transformed exposure measured in pools.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Torie C Plowden; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Group testing regression models with dilution submodels.

Authors:  Md S Warasi; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Cross-sectional biomonitoring study of pesticide exposures in Queensland, Australia, using pooled urine samples.

Authors:  A L Heffernan; K English; Lml Toms; A M Calafat; L Valentin-Blasini; P Hobson; S Broomhall; R S Ware; P Jagals; P D Sly; J F Mueller
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Use of pooled samples to assess human exposure to parabens, benzophenone-3 and triclosan in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  A L Heffernan; C Baduel; L M L Toms; A M Calafat; X Ye; P Hobson; S Broomhall; J F Mueller
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Bisphenol A exposure is not associated with area-level socioeconomic index in Australian children using pooled urine samples.

Authors:  A L Heffernan; P D Sly; L M L Toms; P Hobson; J F Mueller
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.