Literature DB >> 21981372

Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model.

Yaakov Malinovsky1, Paul S Albert, Enrique F Schisterman.   

Abstract

Due to the rising cost of laboratory assays, it has become increasingly common in epidemiological studies to pool biospecimens. This is particularly true in longitudinal studies, where the cost of performing multiple assays over time can be prohibitive. In this article, we consider the problem of estimating the parameters of a Gaussian random effects model when the repeated outcome is subject to pooling. We consider different pooling designs for the efficient maximum likelihood estimation of variance components, with particular attention to estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient. We evaluate the efficiencies of different pooling design strategies using analytic and simulation study results. We examine the robustness of the designs to skewed distributions and consider unbalanced designs. The design methodology is illustrated with a longitudinal study of premenopausal women focusing on assessing the reproducibility of F2-isoprostane, a biomarker of oxidative stress, over the menstrual cycle.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21981372      PMCID: PMC4159259          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Mixed effects models with censored data with application to HIV RNA levels.

Authors:  J P Hughes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The efficiency of pooling mRNA in microarray experiments.

Authors:  C M Kendziorski; Y Zhang; H Lan; A D Attie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Effects of pooling mRNA in microarray class comparisons.

Authors:  Joanna H Shih; Aleksandra M Michalowska; Kevin Dobbin; Yumei Ye; Ting Hu Qiu; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Estimation of ROC curves based on stably distributed biomarkers subject to measurement error and pooling mixtures.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Enrique F Schisterman; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  High levels of urinary F2-isoprostanes predict cardiovascular mortality in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Mark Roest; Hieronymus A M Voorbij; Yvonne T Van der Schouw; Petra H M Peeters; Tom Teerlink; Peter G Scheffer
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.766

9.  Binary regression analysis with pooled exposure measurements: a regression calibration approach.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  14 in total

1.  Case-control data analysis for randomly pooled biomarkers.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Positing, fitting, and selecting regression models for pooled biomarker data.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Semiparametric regression models for a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Regression models for group testing data with pool dilution effects.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher McMahan; Colin Gallagher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Group testing case identification with biomarker information.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Michelle Danaher; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Regression analysis for multiple-disease group testing data.

Authors:  Boan Zhang; Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The biomarker revolution.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.