Literature DB >> 15032787

A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.

Laurence S Freedman1, Vitaly Fainberg, Victor Kipnis, Douglas Midthune, Raymond J Carroll.   

Abstract

We introduce a new method, moment reconstruction, of correcting for measurement error in covariates in regression models. The central idea is similar to regression calibration in that the values of the covariates that are measured with error are replaced by "adjusted" values. In regression calibration the adjusted value is the expectation of the true value conditional on the measured value. In moment reconstruction the adjusted value is the variance-preserving empirical Bayes estimate of the true value conditional on the outcome variable. The adjusted values thereby have the same first two moments and the same covariance with the outcome variable as the unobserved "true" covariate values. We show that moment reconstruction is equivalent to regression calibration in the case of linear regression, but leads to different results for logistic regression. For case-control studies with logistic regression and covariates that are normally distributed within cases and controls, we show that the resulting estimates of the regression coefficients are consistent. In simulations we demonstrate that for logistic regression, moment reconstruction carries less bias than regression calibration, and for case-control studies is superior in mean-square error to the standard regression calibration approach. Finally, we give an example of the use of moment reconstruction in linear discriminant analysis and a nonstandard problem where we wish to adjust a classification tree for measurement error in the explanatory variables.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15032787     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00164.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Measurement error models with interactions.

Authors:  Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Laurence S Freedman; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Correlated biomarker measurement error: an important threat to inference in environmental epidemiology.

Authors:  A Z Pollack; N J Perkins; S L Mumford; A Ye; E F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Moment Adjusted Imputation for Multivariate Measurement Error Data with Applications to Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Laine Thomas; Leonard A Stefanski; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  A moment-adjusted imputation method for measurement error models.

Authors:  Laine Thomas; Leonard Stefanski; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Moment reconstruction and moment-adjusted imputation when exposure is generated by a complex, nonlinear random effects modeling process.

Authors:  Cornelis J Potgieter; Rubin Wei; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A comparison of regression calibration, moment reconstruction and imputation for adjusting for covariate measurement error in regression.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Clinical relevance assessment of animal preclinical research (RAA) tool: development and explanation.

Authors:  Kurinchi S Gurusamy; David Moher; Marilena Loizidou; Irfan Ahmed; Marc T Avey; Carly C Barron; Brian Davidson; Miriam Dwek; Christian Gluud; Gavin Jell; Kiran Katakam; Joshua Montroy; Timothy D McHugh; Nicola J Osborne; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Kees van Laarhoven; Jan Vollert; Manoj Lalu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Regression analysis with categorized regression calibrated exposure: some interesting findings.

Authors:  Ingvild Dalen; John P Buonaccorsi; Petter Laake; Anette Hjartåker; Magne Thoresen
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.