Literature DB >> 24521420

Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling.

Emily M Mitchell1, Robert H Lyles, Amita K Manatunga, Michelle Danaher, Neil J Perkins, Enrique F Schisterman.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies involving biomarkers are often hindered by prohibitively expensive laboratory tests. Strategically pooling specimens prior to performing these lab assays has been shown to effectively reduce cost with minimal information loss in a logistic regression setting. When the goal is to perform regression with a continuous biomarker as the outcome, regression analysis of pooled specimens may not be straightforward, particularly if the outcome is right-skewed. In such cases, we demonstrate that a slight modification of a standard multiple linear regression model for poolwise data can provide valid and precise coefficient estimates when pools are formed by combining biospecimens from subjects with identical covariate values. When these x-homogeneous pools cannot be formed, we propose a Monte Carlo expectation maximization (MCEM) algorithm to compute maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs). Simulation studies demonstrate that these analytical methods provide essentially unbiased estimates of coefficient parameters as well as their standard errors when appropriate assumptions are met. Furthermore, we show how one can utilize the fully observed covariate data to inform the pooling strategy, yielding a high level of statistical efficiency at a fraction of the total lab cost.
© 2014, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Design; Efficiency; MCEM; Pooled specimens; Skewness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24521420      PMCID: PMC3988986          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The Collaborative Perinatal Project: lessons and legacy.

Authors:  Janet B Hardy
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model.

Authors:  Yaakov Malinovsky; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Assessment of skewed exposure in case-control studies with pooling.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Zhiwei Zhang; Aijun Ye; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Likelihood-based methods for regression analysis with binary exposure status assessed by pooling.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Li Tang; Ji Lin; Zhiwei Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Binary regression analysis with pooled exposure measurements: a regression calibration approach.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Circulating chemokine levels and miscarriage.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman; Mark A Klebanoff; Mona Baumgarten; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak; Xiaoping Luo; Nasser Chegini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  13 in total

1.  Positing, fitting, and selecting regression models for pooled biomarker data.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Semiparametric regression models for a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Gamma models for estimating the odds ratio for a skewed biomarker measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher McMahan; Colin Gallagher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Logistic regression with a continuous exposure measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Group testing case identification with biomarker information.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF COMBINED CATEGORICAL BIOMARKER DATA FROM MULTIPLE STUDIES.

Authors:  Chao Cheng; Molin Wang
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  A highly efficient design strategy for regression with outcome pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Varying-coefficient regression analysis for pooled biomonitoring.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Xichen Mou; Yan Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.