Literature DB >> 19679860

Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Davide Bruno1, Philip A Higham, Timothy J Perfect.   

Abstract

Between-list manipulations of memory strength through repetition commonly generate a mirror effect, with more hits and fewer false alarms for strengthened items. However, this pattern is rarely seen with within-list manipulations of strength. In three experiments, we investigated the conditions under which a within-list mirror effect of strength (items presented once or thrice) is observed. In Experiments 1 and 2, we indirectly manipulated the overall subjective memorability of the studied lists by varying the proportion of nonwords. A within-list mirror effect was observed only in Experiment 2, in which a higher proportion of nonwords was presented in the study list. In Experiment 3, the presentation duration for each item (0.5 vs. 3 sec) was manipulated between groups with the purpose of affecting subjective memorability. A within-list mirror effect was observed only for the short presentation durations. Thus, across three experiments, we found the within-list mirror effect only under conditions of poor overall subjective memorability. We propose that when the overall subjective memorability is low, people switch their response strategy on an item-by-item basis and that this generates the observed mirror effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679860     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.6.807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

3.  Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.

Authors:  Philip A Higham; Timothy J Perfect; Davide Bruno
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: evidence for adaptive criterion learning.

Authors:  Sanghoon Han; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

5.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  V Stretch; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  A naturalistic study of the word frequency effect in episodic recognition.

Authors:  K A Chalmers; M S Humphreys; S Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

8.  Effect of delay on recognition decisions: evidence for a criterion shift.

Authors:  Murray Singer; John T Wixted
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

9.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

10.  The mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; David Clewett; Scott Freeman; Amy Frithsen; Christine Tipper; Arianne Johnson; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

2.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

3.  Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Murray Singer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

4.  A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss; Angelina M Pardini
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

5.  One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

6.  Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

7.  The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.

Authors:  Bryan A Franks; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

8.  The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Jesse Sargent; Catherine Trinh Ngo
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-02-25

9.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

10.  Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.