Literature DB >> 20191422

The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.

Stephen Dopkins1, Jesse Sargent, Catherine Trinh Ngo.   

Abstract

On each trial of the experimental procedure the participant read a list of words and made successive recognition judgements to multiple test words. The bias for a given recognition judgement was more conservative if the judgement followed a correct positive response to a target than if it followed a correct negative response to a lure. Similar results were not observed for successive semantic recognition judgements. The bias shift was greater when the study list was short than when the list was long. The results suggest that participants in a recognition task have a sense of the size of the set of targets that might possibly be presented on the next trial and that, under conditions in which a word can only be presented once during the test phase, their bias becomes more conservative after a positive response to a target because the set is depleted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20191422      PMCID: PMC2858259          DOI: 10.1080/09658211003601506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  26 in total

1.  The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.

Authors:  J T Wixted; V Stretch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  ROC curves show that the revelation effect is not a single phenomenon.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  The dynamics of scaling: a memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification.

Authors:  Alexander A Petrov; John R Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Exploring a recognition-induced recognition decrement.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Trinh Catherine Ngo; Jesse Sargent
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

6.  Modeling experimentally induced strategy shifts.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Mark Steyvers; Pernille Hemmer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

7.  The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.

Authors:  W K Estes; W T Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.

Authors:  D L Westerman; R L Greene
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Variation in the standard deviation of the lure rating distribution: Implications for estimates of recollection probability.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Kaitlin Varner; Darin Hoyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

2.  Test position effects on hit and false alarm rates in recognition memory for paintings and words.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Fallow; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-09-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.