Literature DB >> 19744937

Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Murray Singer1.   

Abstract

In manipulations of stimulus strength between lists, a more lenient signal detection criterion is more frequently applied to a weak than to a strong stimulus class. However, with randomly intermixed weak and strong test probes, such a criterion shift often does not result. A procedure that has yielded delay-based within-list criterion shifts was applied to strength manipulations in recognition memory for categorized word lists. When participants made semantic ratings about each stimulus word, strength-based criterion shifts emerged regardless of whether words from pairs of categories were studied in separate blocks (Experiment 1) or in intermixed blocks (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, the criterion shift persisted under the semantic-rating study task, but not under rote memorization. These findings suggest that continually adjusting the recognition decision criterion is cognitively feasible. They provide a technique for manipulating the criterion shift, and they identify competing theoretical accounts of these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744937     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.7.976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  37 in total

1.  On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

3.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

5.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.

Authors:  V Stretch; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

8.  Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.

Authors:  W K Estes; W T Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance.

Authors:  T E Parks
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Strategies of text retrieval: a criterion shift account.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Nathalie Gagnon; Eric Richards
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; David Clewett; Scott Freeman; Amy Frithsen; Christine Tipper; Arianne Johnson; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

4.  Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

5.  Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; James E Olchowski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

6.  The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.

Authors:  Bryan A Franks; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

7.  Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Corey N White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Ignoring memory hints: The stubborn influence of environmental cues on recognition memory.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07

10.  Dubious decision evidence and criterion flexibility in recognition memory.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; Jean M Vettel; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.