Literature DB >> 24523046

Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Jason L Hicks1, Jeffrey J Starns.   

Abstract

In seven experiments, we explored the potential for strength-based, within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory. People studied a mix of target words, some presented four times (strong) and others studied once (weak). In Experiments 1, 2, 4A, and 4B, the test was organized into alternating blocks of 10, 20, or 40 trials. Each block contained lures intermixed with strong targets only or weak targets only. In strength-cued conditions, test probes appeared in a unique font color for strong and weak blocks. In the uncued conditions of Experiments 1 and 2, similar strength blocks were tested, but strength was not cued with font color. False alarms to lures were lower in blocks containing strong target words, as compared with lures in blocks containing weak targets, but only when strength was cued with font color. Providing test feedback in Experiment 2 did not alter these results. In Experiments 3A-3C, test items were presented in a random order (i.e., not blocked by strength). Of these three experiments, only one demonstrated a significant shift even though strength cues were provided. Overall, the criterion shift was larger and more reliable as block size increased, and the shift occurred only when strength was cued with font color. These results clarify the factors that affect participants' willingness to change their response criterion within a test list.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24523046     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0397-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.

Authors:  Philip A Higham; Timothy J Perfect; Davide Bruno
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Davide Bruno; Philip A Higham; Timothy J Perfect
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

5.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  V Stretch; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Amy H Criss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Distinctiveness and repetition in item recognition.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Anjum Fazaluddin; Kathy N Andrew
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2011-09

8.  Overcoming the negative consequences of interference from recognition memory testing.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Amy H Criss; Tarun H Gangwani; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-17

9.  Recognition of categorised words: repetition effects in rote study.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Anjum Fazaluddin; Kathy N Andrew
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-11-21

10.  Signal detection with criterion noise: applications to recognition memory.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Michael Diaz; Serena Wee
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  6 in total

1.  A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss; Angelina M Pardini
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

2.  One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

3.  Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; James E Olchowski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

5.  The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.

Authors:  Bryan A Franks; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

6.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.