Literature DB >> 17645166

Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Michael F Verde1, Caren M Rotello.   

Abstract

We investigated the role that memory strength plays in the decision process by examining the extent to which strength is used as a cue to dynamically modify recognition criteria. The study list consisted of strong and weak items, with strength a function of study duration or repetition. The recognition test list was divided into two consecutive blocks; strong items appeared in one block, weak items in the other. If the change in item strength across blocks leads to a shift in criterion, the false alarm rate should change accordingly. In four experiments, the false alarm rates did not change across blocks, even when the difference between the strong and the weak items was magnified and marked with semantic cues. However, the strength of the items in the first test block affected the false alarm rate. Thus, strength cues influence initial criterion placement but fail to induce criterion shifts following permanent and even dramatic changes in item strength. These null findings are contrasted with those in a fifth experiment, in which accuracy feedback produced dynamic criterion shifts.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645166     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.

Authors:  J T Wixted; V Stretch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Eyewitness testimony.

Authors:  Gary L Wells; Elizabeth A Olson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; S E Clark; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.

Authors:  W K Estes; W T Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.

Authors:  A S Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults.

Authors:  Jason M Watson; Kathleen B McDermott; David A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

10.  Adaptive changes of response criterion in recognition memory.

Authors:  Evan Heit; Noellie Brockdorff; Koen Lamberts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09
View more
  33 in total

1.  Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-10-03

2.  The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

3.  Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory?

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: evidence for adaptive criterion learning.

Authors:  Sanghoon Han; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

6.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; David Clewett; Scott Freeman; Amy Frithsen; Christine Tipper; Arianne Johnson; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

7.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

8.  Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Murray Singer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

9.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

10.  Metacognitive awareness and adaptive recognition biases.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.