Literature DB >> 30790209

A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.

Gregory J Koop1, Amy H Criss2, Angelina M Pardini3.   

Abstract

In single-item recognition, the strength-based mirror effect (SBME) is reliably obtained when encoding strength is manipulated between lists or participants. Debate surrounds the degree to which this effect is due to differentiation (e.g., Criss Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 461-478, 2006) or criterion shifts (e.g., Hicks & Starns Memory & Cognition, 42, 742-754, 2014). Problematically, differing underlying control processes may be equally capable of producing an SBME. The ability of criterion shifts to produce an SBME has been shown in prior work where differentiation was unlikely. The present work likewise produces an SBME under conditions where criterion shifts are unlikely. Specifically, we demonstrate that an SBME can be elicited without the typical number of trials needed to adjust one's decision criterion (Experiments 1, 2, and 5) and using encoding manipulations that do not explicitly alert participants that their memory quality has changed (Experiments 3 and 4). When taken in the context of the broader literature, these results demonstrate the need to prioritize memory models that can predict SBMEs via multiple underlying processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Criterion-shifts; Differentiation; Recognition; Strength based mirror effect

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30790209     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00906-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  36 in total

Review 1.  An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.

Authors:  D E Diller; P A Nobel; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The response dynamics of recognition memory: Sensitivity and bias.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Modeling experimentally induced strategy shifts.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Mark Steyvers; Pernille Hemmer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

4.  Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.

Authors:  Philip A Higham; Timothy J Perfect; Davide Bruno
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Davide Bruno; Philip A Higham; Timothy J Perfect
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

6.  Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Amy H Criss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval.

Authors:  Melissa Lehman; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; James E Olchowski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

9.  The striking similarities between standard, distractor-free, and target-free recognition.

Authors:  Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

10.  Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.