Literature DB >> 9835059

On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.

V Stretch1, J T Wixted.   

Abstract

A mirror effect can be produced by manipulating word class (e.g., high vs. low frequency) or by manipulating strength (e.g., short vs. long study time). The results of 5 experiments reported here suggest that a strength-based mirror effect is caused by a shift in the location of the decision criterion, whereas a frequency-based mirror effect occurs although the criterion remains fixed with respect to word frequency. Evidence supporting these claims is provided by a series of studies in which high frequency (HF) words were differentially strengthened (and sometimes differentially colored) during list presentation. That manipulation increased the HF hit rate above that for low frequency (LF) words without selectively decreasing the HF false alarm rate, just as a fixed-criterion account of the word-frequency mirror effect predicts.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9835059     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  64 in total

1.  Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory.

Authors:  T A Busey; J Tunnicliff; G R Loftus; E F Loftus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Predicting individual false alarm rates and signal detection theory: a role for remembering.

Authors:  I G Dobbins; W Khoe; A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

3.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locus?

Authors:  K A Deffenbacher; J Johanson; T Vetter; A J O'Toole
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

4.  The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  S Sikström
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

5.  Interrupting recognition memory: tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.

Authors:  W E Hockley; M W Niewiadomski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

6.  Cognitive theories as reinforcement history surrogates: the case of likelihood ratio models of human recognition memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Santino C Gaitan
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

7.  The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

8.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

9.  Preserved metamemorial ability in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease: shifting response bias.

Authors:  Jill D Waring; Hyemi Chong; David A Wolk; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Mark E Wheeler; James L McClelland
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.