Literature DB >> 26652722

They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Alex Konkel1, Diana Selmeczy1, Ian G Dobbins1.   

Abstract

Adaptively biasing recognition judgments in light of environmental cues improves net accuracy. Based on previous work suggesting that strategically shifting biases on a trial-wise basis should be cognitively demanding, the authors predicted that older adults would not achieve the same accuracy benefits from environmental cues as the young. However, despite showing clear declines in cognitive control as indexed by complex span, older adults demonstrated similar accuracy gains and similar alterations of response probabilities with cues of 75% reliability (Experiment 1) and more complex cues spanning 3 levels of reliability (Experiment 2). Despite preserved gains in accuracy, older adults clearly demonstrated disproportionate slowing that was specific to trials in which cues were invalid. This slowing may reflect impairments in behavioral inhibition that could impinge upon accuracy were responding increasingly sped and future work manipulating response speed and measures of inhibition may yield further insights. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26652722      PMCID: PMC4681307          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  49 in total

1.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory?

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

3.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The costs and benefits of memory conformity.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Paula Lauris; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Memory complaints in older adults. Fact or fiction?

Authors:  K I Bolla; K N Lindgren; C Bonaccorsy; M L Bleecker
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1991-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Ignoring memory hints: The stubborn influence of environmental cues on recognition memory.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Memory conformity for high-confidence recognition of faces.

Authors:  Weslley Santos Sousa; Antônio Jaeger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.