Literature DB >> 22872581

Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait.

Justin Kantner1, D Stephen Lindsay.   

Abstract

According to signal detection theory, old-new recognition decisions can be affected by response bias, a general proclivity to respond either "old" or "new." In recognition experiments, response bias is usually analyzed at a group level, but substantial individual differences in bias can underlie group means. These differences suggest that, independent of any experimental manipulation, some people require more memory evidence than do others before they are willing to call an item "old." In four experiments, we investigated the possibility that recognition response bias is a partial function of a trait-like predisposition. Bias was highly correlated across two recognition study-test cycles separated by 10 min (Experiment 1). A nearly identical correlation was observed when the tasks were separated by one week (Experiment 2). Bias correlations remained significant even when the stimuli differed sharply between the first and second study-test cycles (Experiment 3). No relationship was detected between bias and response strategies in two general knowledge tests (Experiments 2 and 4), but bias did weakly predict frequency of false recall in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Experiment 4). This evidence of trait-like stability suggests an entirely different aspect of response bias than that studied by examining its modulation by task variables, one for which complete theories of recognition memory may need to account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22872581     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0226-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  39 in total

1.  Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting.

Authors:  Morris Goldsmith; Asher Koriat; Amit Weinberg-Eliezer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

2.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Value of signal detection theory indexes for Wechsler Memory Scale-III recognition measures.

Authors:  John L Woodard; Bradley N Axelrod; Kristen L Mordecai; Kerri D Shannon
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory?

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

5.  Dissociations in hippocampal and frontal contributions to episodic memory performance.

Authors:  Joel H Kramer; Howard J Rosen; An-Tao Du; Norbert Schuff; Caroline Hollnagel; Michael W Weiner; Bruce L Miller; Dean C Delis
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

8.  Adults' memories of childhood: true and false reports.

Authors:  Jianjian Qin; Christin M Ogle; Gail S Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2008-12

9.  The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Michael B Miller; Scott A Guerin; George L Wolford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Memory and metamemory in schizophrenia: a liberal acceptance account of psychosis.

Authors:  S Moritz; T S Woodward; L Jelinek; R Klinge
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  21 in total

1.  Distinct anatomical correlates of discriminability and criterion setting in verbal recognition memory revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  J Matthijs Biesbroek; Martine J E van Zandvoort; L Jaap Kappelle; Linda Schoo; Hugo J Kuijf; Birgitta K Velthuis; Geert Jan Biessels; Albert Postma
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories.

Authors:  Bi Zhu; Chuansheng Chen; Elizabeth F Loftus; Chongde Lin; Qi Dong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

3.  The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.

Authors:  Bryan A Franks; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

4.  Live liver donors' risk thresholds: risking a life to save a life.

Authors:  Michele Molinari; Jacob Matz; Sarah DeCoutere; Karim El-Tawil; Bassam Abu-Wasel; Valerie Keough
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; David A Balota; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time, choice objects, domains, and presentation formats.

Authors:  Martha Michalkiewicz; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

9.  Response Bias Reflects Individual Differences in Sensory Encoding.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01

10.  Cross-situational consistency in recognition memory response bias.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.