Literature DB >> 22555888

Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Elissa M Aminoff1, David Clewett, Scott Freeman, Amy Frithsen, Christine Tipper, Arianne Johnson, Scott T Grafton, Michael B Miller.   

Abstract

An ability to flexibly shift a decision criterion can be advantageous. For example, a known change in the base rate of targets and distractors on a recognition memory test will lead optimal decision makers to shift their criterion accordingly. In the present study, 95 individuals participated in two recognition memory tests that included periodic changes in the base rate probability that the test stimulus had been presented during the study session. The results reveal a wide variability in the tendency to shift decision criterion in response to this probability information, with some appropriately shifting and others not shifting at all. However, participants were highly reliable in their tendency to shift criterion across tests. The goal of the present study was to explain what factors account for these individual differences. To accomplish this, over 50 variables were assessed for each individual (e.g., personality, cognitive style, state of mind). Using a regression model that incorporated different sets of factors, over 50% of the variance was accounted for. The results of the analysis describe the total, direct, and mediating effects on criterion shifting from factors that include memory strength, strategy, and inherent characteristics such as a fun-seeking personality, a negative affect, and military rank. The results are discussed with respect to understanding why participants rarely chose an optimal decision-making strategy and provide greater insight into the underlying mechanisms of recognition memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22555888     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0204-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  35 in total

1.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

3.  Individual differences in cognitive control: the role of psychoticism and working memory in set-shifting.

Authors:  Luke D Smillie; Andrew J Cooper; Ian J Tharp; Emma L Pelling
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2008-12-01

Review 4.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.

Authors:  Derek J Koehler; Greta James
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-08-06

6.  The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Michael B Miller; Scott A Guerin; George L Wolford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; S E Clark; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance.

Authors:  T E Parks
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Strategies of text retrieval: a criterion shift account.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Nathalie Gagnon; Eric Richards
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-03

Review 10.  The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 18.688

View more
  21 in total

1.  Task effects determine whether recognition memory is mediated discretely or continuously.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdoo; Kylie N Key; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

2.  Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait.

Authors:  Justin Kantner; D Stephen Lindsay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

3.  The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.

Authors:  Bryan A Franks; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

4.  Functional connectivity with distinct neural networks tracks fluctuations in gain/loss framing susceptibility.

Authors:  David V Smith; Kamila E Sip; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Social influences on adaptive criterion learning.

Authors:  Brittany S Cassidy; Chad Dubé; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

6.  Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.

Authors:  Christopher Kent; Koen Lamberts; Richard Patton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time, choice objects, domains, and presentation formats.

Authors:  Martha Michalkiewicz; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

8.  Individual differences in intrinsic brain connectivity predict decision strategy.

Authors:  Kelly Anne Barnes; Kevin M Anderson; Mark Plitt; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Detection of functional brain network reconfiguration during task-driven cognitive states.

Authors:  Qawi K Telesford; Mary-Ellen Lynall; Jean Vettel; Michael B Miller; Scott T Grafton; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.