Literature DB >> 28613933

Quantification of radiation dose reduction by reducing z-axis coverage in 320-detector coronary CT angiography.

David J Murphy1, Abhishek Keraliya1, Nathan Himes1, Ayaz Aghayev1, Ron Blankstein1, Michael L Steigner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the radiation dose reduction achievable by minimizing z-axis coverage in 320-detector coronary CT angiography (CCTA).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 130 CCTAs performed on 320-detector CT that offers up to 16 cm z-axis coverage (adjustable in 2-cm increments), allowing complete coverage of the heart in a single gantry rotation. For each CT, we obtained the radiation dose [CT dose index and dose-length product (DLP)], measured the z-axis field of view and measured the craniocaudal cardiac size (distance from the left main coronary artery to the cardiac apex). We calculated the radiation dose savings achievable by reducing the z-axis coverage to the minimum necessary to cover the heart using 320 × 0.5-mm (maximum 16 cm) and 256 × 0.5-mm (maximum 12.8 cm) detector collimations.
RESULTS: Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The mean craniocaudal cardiac size was 10.5 ± 1.0 cm, with 85% (n = 112) of CCTAs performed with 16 cm of z-axis coverage. The mean DLP was 417.6 ± 182.4 mGy cm, with the mean DLP saving achievable using the minimum z-axis coverage required to completely image the heart being 96.2 ± 47.4 mGy cm, an average dose reduction of 26.9 ± 7.0%. z-axis coverage of ≤12 cm was adequate for 92% and 12.8 cm for 98% of subjects.
CONCLUSION: Using the minimal z-axis coverage to adequately image the heart is a simple step that can reduce the DLP in 320-detector CCTA by approximately 27%. z-axis coverage of ≤12 cm is adequate for 92%, 12.8 cm for 98% and 14 cm for 100% of patients undergoing CCTA. Advances in knowledge: Reducing z-axis coverage in 320-detector CCTA can reduce DLP by approximately 27%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28613933      PMCID: PMC5607480          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  34 in total

1.  Whole-heart 320-row computed tomography: reduction of radiation dose via prior coronary calcium scanning.

Authors:  E Zimmermann; M Dewey
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2010-08-19

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Dose of reduced z-axis length of computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest for pulmonary embolism using 64-detector rows and adaptive iterative reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Jared Martillotti; Naomi Silva; Jyoti Chhabra; Christian Molstrom; Ryan Coughlin; Michael O'Loughlin; Bret Coughlin
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-08-17

4.  Radiation dose assessment in a 320-detector-row CT scanner used in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Carles Gomà; Agustín Ruiz; Núria Jornet; Artur Latorre; Rosa M Pallerol; Pablo Carrasco; Teresa Eudaldo; Montserrat Ribas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  How to Appropriately Calculate Effective Dose for CT Using Either Size-Specific Dose Estimates or Dose-Length Product.

Authors:  Samuel L Brady; Amy E Mirro; Bria M Moore; Robert A Kaufman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Patient dose for computed tomography examination: dose reference levels and effective doses based on a national survey of 2013 in Korea.

Authors:  Moon Chan Kim; Dong Kyoon Han; Yoon Chul Nam; Yon Min Kim; Joon Yoon
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 7.  Cardiac computed tomography technology and dose-reduction strategies.

Authors:  James P Earls; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; M Zankl; E Angel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  On the risk to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionizing radiation during medical imaging procedures - IOMP policy statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Potential increase in radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks with higher doses of iodine contrast during coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Toon Van Cauteren; Kaoru Tanaka; Dries Belsack; Gert Van Gompel; Veerle Kersemans; Kristin Jochmans; Steven Droogmans; Johan de Mey; Nico Buls
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Reduced Axial Scan Length Coronary Calcium Scoring Reduces Radiation Dose and Provides Adequate Clinical Decision-Making Before Coronary CT Angiography.

Authors:  Colin R Young; David A Reynolds; Neil Gambill; Daniel I Brooks; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-12

3.  Impact of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CT coronary angiography scan length and effective radiation dose.

Authors:  Laura Duerden; Helen O'Brien; Susan Doshi; Pia Charters; Laurence King; Benjamin J Hudson; Jonathan Carl Luis Rodrigues
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-09-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.