Literature DB >> 15895591

Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry.

Shinichiro Mori1, Masahiro Endo, Kanae Nishizawa, Takanori Tsunoo, Takahiko Aoyama, Hideaki Fujiwara, Kenya Murase.   

Abstract

In order to examine phantom length necessary to assess radiation dose delivered to patients in cone-beam CT with an enlarged beamwidth, we measured dose profiles in cylindrical phantoms of sufficient length using a prototype 256-slice CT-scanner developed at our institute. Dose profiles parallel to the rotation axis were measured at the central and peripheral positions in PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) phantoms of 160 or 320 mm diameter and 900 mm length. For practical application, we joined unit cylinders (150 mm long) together to provide phantoms of 900 mm length. Dose profiles were measured with a pin photodiode sensor having a sensitive region of approximately 2.8 x 2.8 mm2 and 2.7 mm thickness. Beamwidths of the scanner were varied from 20 to 138 mm. Dose profile integrals (DPI) were calculated using the measured dose profiles for various beamwidths and integration ranges. For the body phantom (320-mm-diam phantom), 76% of the DPI was represented for a 20 mm beamwidth and 60% was represented for a 138 mm beamwidth if dose profiles were integrated over a 100 mm range, while more than 90% of the DPI was represented for beamwidths between 20 and 138 mm if integration was carried out over a 300 mm range. The phantom length and integration range for dosimetry of cone-beam CT needed to be more than 300 mm to represent more than 90% of the DPI for the body phantom with the beamwidth of more than 20 mm. Although we reached this conclusion using the prototype 256-slice CT-scanner, it may be applied to other multislice CT-scanners as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895591     DOI: 10.1118/1.1877852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index.

Authors:  R Pauwels; C Theodorakou; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Jacobs; K Horner; R Bogaerts
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Cone beam CT dosimetry: a unified and self-consistent approach including all scan modalities--with or without phantom motion.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Properties of the prototype 256-row (cone beam) CT scanner.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Masahiro Endo; Takayuki Obata; Takanori Tsunoo; Kandatsu Susumu; Shuji Tanada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24

5.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Effect of dose reduction on image registration and image quality for cone-beam CT in radiotherapy.

Authors:  B Loutfi-Krauss; J Köhn; N Blümer; K Freundl; T Koch; E Kara; C Scherf; C Rödel; U Ramm; J Licher
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Dose exposure of patients undergoing comprehensive stroke imaging by multidetector-row CT: comparison of 320-detector row and 64-detector row CT scanners.

Authors:  S Diekmann; E Siebert; R Juran; M Roll; W Deeg; H-C Bauknecht; F Diekmann; R Klingebiel; G Bohner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Practical patient dosimetry for partial rotation cone beam CT.

Authors:  E C Podnieks; I S Negus
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evaluation of patient dose measurements.

Authors:  Y Kyriakou; G Richter; A Dörfler; W A Kalender
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner.

Authors:  J Geleijns; M Salvadó Artells; P W de Bruin; R Matter; Y Muramatsu; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.