Literature DB >> 18710988

Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Walter Huda1, Kent M Ogden, Mohammad R Khorasani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine effective dose (ED) per unit dose-length product (DLP) conversion factors for computed tomographic (CT) dosimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT dosimetry spreadsheet was used to compute patient ED values and corresponding DLP values. The ratio of ED to DLP was determined with 16-section CT scanners from four vendors, as well as with five models from one manufacturer that spanned more than 25 years. ED-to-DLP ratios were determined for 2-cm scan lengths along the patient axis, as well as for typical scan lengths encountered at head and body CT examinations. The dependence of the ratio of ED to DLP on x-ray tube voltage (in kilovolts) was investigated, and the values obtained with the spreadsheet were compared with those obtained by using two other commercially available CT dosimetry software packages.
RESULTS: For 2-cm scan lengths, changes in the scan region resulted in differences to ED of a factor of 30, but much lower variation was obtained for typical scan lengths at clinical head and body imaging. Inter- and intramanufacturer differences for ED/DLP were generally small. Representative values of ED/DLP at 120 kV were 2.2 microSv/mGy x cm (head scans), 5.4 microSv/mGy x cm (cervical spine scans), and 18 microSv/mGy x cm (body scans). For head scans, ED/DLP was approximately independent of x-ray tube voltage, but for body scans, the increase from 80 to 140 kV increased the ratio of ED to DLP by approximately 25%. Agreement in ED/DLP data for all three software packages was generally very good, except for cervical spine examinations where one software package determined an ED/DLP ratio that was approximately double that of the other two.
CONCLUSION: This article describes a method of providing CT users with a practical and reliable estimate of adult patient EDs by using the DLP displayed on the CT console at the end of any given examination. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18710988      PMCID: PMC2657852          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483071964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  Managing patient dose in computed tomography. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2000

Review 2.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients.

Authors:  Otha W Linton; Fred A Mettler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.

Authors:  G Brix; U Lechel; R Veit; R Truckenbrodt; G Stamm; E M Coppenrath; J Griebel; H-D Nagel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1991

6.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT].

Authors:  G Stamm; H D Nagel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-12

7.  Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index.

Authors:  Edward L Nickoloff; Ajoy K Dutta; Zheng F Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.

Authors:  F A Mettler; P W Wiest; J A Locken; C A Kelsey
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  Calculation of effective dose.

Authors:  C H McCollough; B A Schueler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  138 in total

1.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults.

Authors:  Gaurav S Desai; Raul N Uppot; Elaine W Yu; Avinash R Kambadakone; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Is routine pelvic surveillance imaging necessary in patients with Wilms tumor?

Authors:  Sue C Kaste; Samuel L Brady; Brian Yee; Valerie J McPherson; Robert A Kaufman; Catherine A Billups; Najat C Daw; Alberto S Pappo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A pediatric CT dose and risk estimator.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Grace S Phillips
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-07-11

6.  Radiation dose from volumetric helical perfusion CT of the thorax, abdomen or pelvis.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Minaxi Dattani; Joseph Farwell; Jane Shekhdar; Emily Tam; Shilpan Patel; Jaspal Juttla; Ian Simcock; James Stirling; Henry Mandeville; Edwin Aird; P Hoskin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dose levels at coronary CT angiography--a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT.

Authors:  J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Tobias B Maurer; Rene Aschenbach; Huedayi Korkusuz; Thomas Lehnert; Simon Deseive; Hanns Ackermann; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Coronary calcium screening with dual-source CT: reliability of ungated, high-pitch chest CT in comparison with dedicated calcium-scoring CT.

Authors:  Antoine Hutt; Alain Duhamel; Valérie Deken; Jean-Baptiste Faivre; Francesco Molinari; Jacques Remy; Martine Remy-Jardin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Perfusion CT best predicts outcome after radioembolization of liver metastases: a comparison of radionuclide and CT imaging techniques.

Authors:  Fabian Morsbach; Bert-Ram Sah; Lea Spring; Gilbert Puippe; Sonja Gordic; Burkhardt Seifert; Niklaus Schaefer; Thomas Pfammatter; Hatem Alkadhi; Caecilia S Reiner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.