Literature DB >> 19351977

The efficiency of the human observer for lesion detection and localization in emission tomography.

Bin Liu1, Lili Zhou, Santosh Kulkarni, Gene Gindi.   

Abstract

For the medically relevant task of joint detection and localization of a signal (lesion) in an emission computed tomographic (ECT) image, it is of interest to measure the efficiency, defined as the relative task performance of a human observer versus that of an ideal observer. Efficiency studies can be used in system optimization, improving postprocessing (e.g., reconstruction) algorithms, deriving human-emulating model observers and computer-aided detection methods. Calculation of ideal observer performance for ECT is highly computationally complex. We can, however, compute ideal observer performance exactly using a simplified 'filtered-noise' model of ECT. This model results in images whose correlation structure, due to quantum noise, background variability and regularization, is similar to that of real ECT reconstructed images. A two-alternative forced choice test is used to obtain the performance of the human observers. We compare the efficiency of our joint detection-localization task with that of a corresponding signal-known-exactly (SKE) detection task. For the joint task, efficiency is low when the search tolerance is stringent. Efficiency for the joint task rises with signal intensity but is flat for the SKE task. For both tasks, efficiency peaks at a mid-range level of regularization corresponding to a particular noise-resolution tradeoff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19351977      PMCID: PMC2860876          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  A comparison of human and model observers in multislice LROC studies.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford; Michael A King; P Hendrik Pretorius; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Estimation receiver operating characteristic curve and ideal observers for combined detection/estimation tasks.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Ideal versus human observer for long-tailed point spread functions: does deconvolution help?

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett; G W Seeley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.

Authors:  R G Swensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects.

Authors:  A E Burgess; X Li; C K Abbey
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Model observers for assessment of image quality.

Authors:  H H Barrett; J Yao; J P Rolland; K J Myers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds.

Authors:  Subok Park; Eric Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  6 in total

1.  A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  On the choice of acceptance radius in free-response observer performance studies.

Authors:  T M Haygood; J Ryan; P C Brennan; S Li; E M Marom; M F McEntee; M Itani; M Evanoff; D Chakraborty
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Frank W Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; John M Boone; Miguel P Eckstein; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Numerical Surrogates for Human Observers in Myocardial Motion Evaluation From SPECT Images.

Authors:  Thibault Marin; Mahdi M Kalayeh; Felipe M Parages; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Lingyun Chen; James M Kofler; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Observer efficiency in free-localization tasks with correlated noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.