Literature DB >> 8946368

Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.

R G Swensson1.   

Abstract

In this paper methods used to measure observer performance are reviewed, and a simple general model for finding and reporting target objects in gray-scale image backgrounds is presented. That model provides the basis for a combined measurement of detection and localization performance in various image-interpretation tasks, whether by human observers or by realized computer algorithms. The model assumes that (1) an observer's detection response and first choice of target location both depend on the "maximally suspicious" finding on an image, (2) a correct (first-choice) localization of the actual target occurs if and only if its location is selected as the most suspicious, and (3) a target's presence does not alter the degree of suspicion engendered by any other (normal) image findings. Formalization of these assumptions relates the ROC curve, which measures the ability to discriminate between images containing targets and images without targets, to the "Localization Response" (LROC) curve, which measures the conjoint ability to detect and correctly localize the actual targets in those images. A maximum-likelihood statistical procedure, developed for a two-parameter "binormal" version of this model, concurrently fits both the ROC and LROC curves from an observer's image ratings and target localizations for a set of image interpretations. The model's application is illustrated (and compared to standard ROC analysis) using sets of rating and localization data from radiologists asked to search chest films for pulmonary nodules. This model is then extended to multiple-report ("free-response") interpretations of multiple-target images, under the stringent requirement that an observer's detection capability and criterion for reporting possible targets both remain stationary across images and across the successive reports made on a given image. That extended model yields formulations and predictions for the so-called "Free-Response" (FROC) curve, and for a recently proposed "Alternative FROC" (AFROC) curve. Tests of that model's "stationarity" assumptions are illustrated using radiologists' free-search interpretations of chest films for pulmonary nodules, and they suggest that human observers may often violate those assumptions when making multiple-report interpretations of images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8946368     DOI: 10.1118/1.597758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  78 in total

1.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Attenuation compensation in cerebral 3D PET: effect of the attenuation map on absolute and relative quantitation.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Marie-Louise Montandon; Daniel O Slosman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Basic concepts and development of an all-purpose computer interface for ROC/FROC observer study.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Daisuke Fukuoka; Takeshi Hara; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-07-05

Review 5.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

6.  Rapid Computation of LROC Figures of Merit Using Numerical Observers (for SPECT/PET Reconstruction).

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Gene Gindi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.679

Review 7.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  An evaluation of iterative reconstruction strategies based on mediastinal lesion detection using hybrid Ga-67 SPECT images.

Authors:  Nicholas F Pereira; Howard C Gifford; P Hendrik Pretorius; Mark Smyczynski; Robert Licho; Peter Schneider; Troy Farncombe; Michael A King
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.