Literature DB >> 22736638

A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.

Adam Wunderlich, Frédéric Noo.   

Abstract

In contrast to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) assessment paradigm, localization ROC (LROC) analysis provides a means to jointly assess the accuracy of localization and detection in an observer study. In a typical multireader, multicase (MRMC) evaluation, the data sets are paired so that correlations arise in observer performance both between readers and across the imaging conditions (e.g., reconstruction methods or scanning parameters) being compared. Therefore, MRMC evaluations motivate the need for a statistical methodology to compare correlated LROC curves. In this work, we suggest a nonparametric strategy for this purpose. Specifically, we find that seminal work of Sen on U-statistics can be applied to estimate the covariance matrix for a vector of LROC area estimates. The resulting covariance estimator is the LROC analog of the covariance estimator given by DeLong et al. for ROC analysis. Once the covariance matrix is estimated, it can be used to construct confidence intervals and/or confidence regions for purposes of comparing observer performance across imaging conditions. In addition, given the results of a small-scale pilot study, the covariance estimator may be used to estimate the number of images and observers needed to achieve a desired confidence interval size in a full-scale observer study. The utility of our methodology is illustrated with a human-observer LROC evaluation of three image reconstruction strategies for fan-beam x-ray computed tomography (CT).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22736638      PMCID: PMC3619029          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2205015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  28 in total

1.  Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.

Authors:  R F Wagner; S V Beiden; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.

Authors:  S J Starr; C E Metz; L B Lusted; D J Goodenough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

4.  Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Feng Li; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin S Berbaum; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.

Authors:  H H Song
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; Margarita L Zuley; Christiane M Hakim; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Jules H Sumkin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Noel F Black; James J Hamill; Vladimir Y Panin; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  8 in total

1.  Nonparametric estimation receiver operating characteristic analysis for performance evaluation on combined detection and estimation tasks.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Bart Goossens
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-08-26

2.  Deep-learning-based model observer for a lung nodule detection task in computed tomography.

Authors:  Hao Gong; Qiyuan Hu; Andrew Walther; Chi Wan Koo; Edwin A Takahashi; David L Levin; Tucker F Johnson; Megan J Hora; Shuai Leng; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: II. Mathematical model observer performance correlates with human observer performance for localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging.

Authors:  Samantha K N Dilger; Shuai Leng; Baiyu Chen; Rickey E Carter; Chris P Favazza; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: I. Correlation of human observer performance between anatomical and uniform backgrounds.

Authors:  Samantha K N Dilger; Lifeng Yu; Baiyu Chen; Chris P Favazza; Rickey E Carter; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Deep-learning model observer for a low-contrast hepatic metastases localization task in computed tomography.

Authors:  Hao Gong; Joel G Fletcher; Jay P Heiken; Michael L Wells; Shuai Leng; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  Optimal Joint Detection and Estimation That Maximizes ROC-Type Curves.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Bart Goossens; Craig K Abbey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Yi Zhang; Rickey Carter; Alicia Y Toledano; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A flexible three-dimensional heterophase computed tomography hepatocellular carcinoma detection algorithm for generalizable and practical screening.

Authors:  Chi-Tung Cheng; Jinzheng Cai; Wei Teng; Youjing Zheng; Yu-Ting Huang; Yu-Chao Wang; Chien-Wei Peng; Youbao Tang; Wei-Chen Lee; Ta-Sen Yeh; Jing Xiao; Le Lu; Chien-Hung Liao; Adam P Harrison
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2022-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.