Literature DB >> 29532479

Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.

Craig K Abbey1, Frank W Samuelson2, Rongping Zeng2, John M Boone3, Miguel P Eckstein1, Kyle Myers2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigates forced localization of targets in simulated images with statistical properties similar to trans-axial sections of x-ray computed tomography (CT) volumes. A total of 24 imaging conditions are considered, comprising two target sizes, three levels of background variability, and four levels of frequency apodization. The goal of the study is to better understand how human observers perform forced-localization tasks in images with CT-like statistical properties.
METHODS: The transfer properties of CT systems are modeled by a shift-invariant transfer function in addition to apodization filters that modulate high spatial frequencies. The images contain noise that is the combination of a ramp-spectrum component, simulating the effect of acquisition noise in CT, and a power-law component, simulating the effect of normal anatomy in the background, which are modulated by the apodization filter as well. Observer performance is characterized using two psychophysical techniques: efficiency analysis and classification image analysis. Observer efficiency quantifies how much diagnostic information is being used by observers to perform a task, and classification images show how that information is being accessed in the form of a perceptual filter.
RESULTS: Psychophysical studies from five subjects form the basis of the results. Observer efficiency ranges from 29% to 77% across the different conditions. The lowest efficiency is observed in conditions with uniform backgrounds, where significant effects of apodization are found. The classification images, estimated using smoothing windows, suggest that human observers use center-surround filters to perform the task, and these are subjected to a number of subsequent analyses. When implemented as a scanning linear filter, the classification images appear to capture most of the observer variability in efficiency (r2 = 0.86). The frequency spectra of the classification images show that frequency weights generally appear bandpass in nature, with peak frequency and bandwidth that vary with statistical properties of the images.
CONCLUSIONS: In these experiments, the classification images appear to capture important features of human-observer performance. Frequency apodization only appears to have a significant effect on performance in the absence of anatomical variability, where the observers appear to underweight low spatial frequencies that have relatively little noise. Frequency weights derived from the classification images generally have a bandpass structure, with adaptation to different conditions seen in the peak frequency and bandwidth. The classification image spectra show relatively modest changes in response to different levels of apodization, with some evidence that observers are attempting to rebalance the apodized spectrum presented to them.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification images; noise; noise power spectrum; observer performance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532479      PMCID: PMC5948178          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  39 in total

1.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours.

Authors:  J M Gold; R F Murray; P J Bennett; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response.

Authors:  Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

3.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Roger J Zemp; Jie Liu; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects.

Authors:  A E Burgess; X Li; C K Abbey
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Spatial summation in visual noise.

Authors:  D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography.

Authors:  S J Riederer; N J Pelc; D A Chesler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.

Authors:  Nathan J Packard; Craig K Abbey; Kai Yang; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.

Authors:  Kathrine G Metheany; Craig K Abbey; Nathan Packard; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  A minimum SNR criterion for computed tomography object detection in the projection domain.

Authors:  Scott S Hsieh; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Nathan R Huber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Medical image quality metrics for foveated model observers.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-08-16

3.  Human observer templates for lesion discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Frank W Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; John M Boone; Miguel P Eckstein; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

4.  Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel A Lago; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.