Literature DB >> 15669610

Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds.

Subok Park1, Eric Clarkson, Matthew A Kupinski, Harrison H Barrett.   

Abstract

The efficiencies of the human observer and the channelized-Hotelling observer relative to the ideal observer for signal-detection tasks are discussed. Both signal-known-exactly (SKE) tasks and signal-known-statistically (SKS) tasks are considered. Signal location is uncertain for the SKS tasks, and lumpy backgrounds are used for background uncertainty in both cases. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are employed to determine ideal-observer performance on the detection tasks. Psychophysical studies are conducted to compute human-observer performance on the same tasks. Efficiency is computed as the squared ratio of the detectabilities of the observer of interest to the ideal observer. Human efficiencies are approximately 2.1% and 24%, respectively, for the SKE and SKS tasks. The results imply that human observers are not affected as much as the ideal observer by signal-location uncertainty even though the ideal observer outperforms the human observer for both tasks. Three different simplified pinhole imaging systems are simulated, and the humans and the model observers rank the systems in the same order for both the SKE and the SKS tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15669610      PMCID: PMC2464287          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.22.000003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  18 in total

1.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms.

Authors:  Yani Zhang; Binh Pham; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Ideal-observer performance under signal and background uncertainty.

Authors:  S Park; M A Kupinski; E Clarkson; H H Barrett
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2003-07

6.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Effect of inherent location uncertainty on detection of stationary targets in noisy image sequences.

Authors:  R M Manjeshwar; D L Wilson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification.

Authors:  A E Burgess; H Ghandeharian
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Detection of noisy visual targets: models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  R G Swensson; P F Judy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

10.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  22 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal correlation of optical coherence tomography in-vivo images of rabbit airway for the diagnosis of edema.

Authors:  DongYel Kang; Alex Wang; Veronika Volgger; Zhongping Chen; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Factors affecting the normality of channel outputs of channelized model observers: an investigation using realistic myocardial perfusion SPECT images.

Authors:  Fatma E A Elshahaby; Michael Ghaly; Abhinav K Jha; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  Objective assessment of image quality. IV. Application to adaptive optics.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Devaney; Christopher Dainty
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Assessment of a fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging system using the Hotelling observer.

Authors:  Amit K Sahu; Amit Joshi; Matthew A Kupinski; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Aperture optimization in emission imaging using ideal observers for joint detection and localization.

Authors:  Lili Zhou; Parmeshwar Khurd; Santosh Kulkarni; Anand Rangarajan; Gene Gindi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Full receiver operating characteristic curve estimation using two alternative forced choice studies.

Authors:  Francesc Massanes; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-02-05

9.  A comparison of resampling schemes for estimating model observer performance with small ensembles.

Authors:  Fatma E A Elshahaby; Abhinav K Jha; Michael Ghaly; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The efficiency of the human observer for lesion detection and localization in emission tomography.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Lili Zhou; Santosh Kulkarni; Gene Gindi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.