Literature DB >> 19272998

Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Dan J Kadrmas1, Michael E Casey, Noel F Black, James J Hamill, Vladimir Y Panin, Maurizio Conti.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the lesion detection performance of four fully-3D positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction schemes using experimentally acquired data. A multi-compartment anthropomorphic phantom was set up to mimic whole-body (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) cancer imaging and scanned 12 times in 3D mode, obtaining count levels typical of noisy clinical scans. Eight of the scans had 26 (68)Ge "shell-less" lesions (6, 8-, 10-, 12-, 16-mm diameter) placed throughout the phantom with various target:background ratios. This provided lesion-present and lesion-absent datasets with known truth appropriate for evaluating lesion detectability by localization receiver operating characteristic (LROC) methods. Four reconstruction schemes were studied: 1) Fourier rebinning (FORE) followed by 2D attenuation-weighted ordered-subsets expectation-maximization, 2) fully-3D AW-OSEM, 3) fully-3D ordinary-Poisson line-of-response (LOR-)OSEM; and 4) fully-3D LOR-OSEM with an accurate point-spread function (PSF) model. Two forms of LROC analysis were performed. First, a channelized nonprewhitened (CNPW) observer was used to optimize processing parameters (number of iterations, post-reconstruction filter) for the human observer study. Human observers then rated each image and selected the most-likely lesion location. The area under the LROC curve ( A(LROC)) and the probability of correct localization were used as figures-of-merit. The results of the human observer study found no statistically significant difference between FORE and AW-OSEM3D ( A(LROC)=0.41 and 0.36, respectively), an increase in lesion detection performance for LOR-OSEM3D ( A(LROC)=0.45, p=0.076), and additional improvement with the use of the PSF model ( A(LROC)=0.55, p=0.024). The numerical CNPW observer provided the same rankings among algorithms, but obtained different values of A(LROC). These results show improved lesion detection performance for the reconstruction algorithms with more sophisticated statistical and imaging models as compared to the previous-generation algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19272998      PMCID: PMC2798572          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2006520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  25 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Eric C Frey; Karen L Gilland; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Evaluation of video gray-scale display.

Authors:  R D Nawfel; K H Chan; D J Wagenaar; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

Authors:  H M Hudson; R S Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data.

Authors:  M Defrise; P E Kinahan; D W Townsend; C Michel; M Sibomana; D F Newport
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Rotate-and-slant projector for fast LOR-based fully-3-D iterative PET reconstruction.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Assessment of scatter compensation strategies for (67)Ga SPECT using numerical observers and human LROC studies.

Authors:  Troy H Farncombe; Howard C Gifford; Manoj V Narayanan; P Hendrik Pretorius; Eric C Frey; Michael A King
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  23 in total

1.  A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jinyi Qi; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Personalized Models for Injected Activity Levels in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Albert Juan Ramon; Yongyi Yang; P Hendrik Pretorius; Karen L Johnson; Michael A King; Miles N Wernick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Effect of Using 2mm Voxels on Observer Performance for PET Lesion Detection.

Authors:  A Michael Morey; Frédéric Noo; Dan J Kadrmas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.679

6.  Effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on detectability of myocardial defects in PET.

Authors:  Joshua Schaefferkoetter; Jinsong Ouyang; Yothin Rakvongthai; Carmela Nappi; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Physiological ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by the spinal cord: is it a point of consideration for cancer patients?

Authors:  Amr Amin; Sandra J Rosenbaum; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Optimization of injection dose based on noise-equivalent count rate with use of an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom in three-dimensional 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Kazumasa Inoue; Hideo Kurosawa; Takashi Tanaka; Masahiro Fukushi; Noriyuki Moriyama; Hirofumi Fujii
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-12-30

9.  A fillable micro-hollow sphere lesion detection phantom using superposition.

Authors:  Frank P Difilippo; Sven L Gallo; Ryan S Klatte; Sagar Patel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Bjoern W Jakoby; Cristina Lois; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.