Literature DB >> 7063747

The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

J A Hanley, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

A representation and interpretation of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve obtained by the "rating" method, or by mathematical predictions based on patient characteristics, is presented. It is shown that in such a setting the area represents the probability that a randomly chosen diseased subject is (correctly) rated or ranked with greater suspicion than a randomly chosen non-diseased subject. Moreover, this probability of a correct ranking is the same quantity that is estimated by the already well-studied nonparametric Wilcoxon statistic. These two relationships are exploited to (a) provide rapid closed-form expressions for the approximate magnitude of the sampling variability, i.e., standard error that one uses to accompany the area under a smoothed ROC curve, (b) guide in determining the size of the sample required to provide a sufficiently reliable estimate of this area, and (c) determine how large sample sizes should be to ensure that one can statistically detect differences in the accuracy of diagnostic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7063747     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  2000 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A genetic algorithm to select variables in logistic regression: example in the domain of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Vinterbo; L Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

3.  Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Dreiseitl; L Ohno-Machado; S Vinterbo
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

4.  Comparison of the Goldmann-Weekers dark adaptometer and LKC Technologies Scotopic Sensitivity tester-1.

Authors:  A Y Peters; K G Locke; D G Birch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Low-cost soft-copy display accuracy in the detection of pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy subtraction: comparison with hard-copy viewing.

Authors:  S Kido; K Kuriyama; N Hosomi; E Inoue; C Kuroda; T Horai
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Anatomy of a meta-analysis: a critical review of "exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance".

Authors:  S M Kymes; D E Bruns; L J Shaw; K N Gillespie; J W Fletcher
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  New approaches to measuring the performance of programs that generate differential diagnoses using ROC curves and other metrics.

Authors:  H S Fraser; S Naimi; W J Long
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

8.  Models to predict cardiovascular risk: comparison of CART, multilayer perceptron and logistic regression.

Authors:  I Colombet; A Ruelland; G Chatellier; F Gueyffier; P Degoulet; M C Jaulent
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

9.  Diagnosis of MRSA with neural networks and logistic regression approach.

Authors:  J S Shang; Y S Lin; A M Goetz
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-09

10.  Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; R F Wagner; L Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.