Literature DB >> 18218538

Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

H M Hudson1, R S Larkin.   

Abstract

The authors define ordered subset processing for standard algorithms (such as expectation maximization, EM) for image restoration from projections. Ordered subsets methods group projection data into an ordered sequence of subsets (or blocks). An iteration of ordered subsets EM is defined as a single pass through all the subsets, in each subset using the current estimate to initialize application of EM with that data subset. This approach is similar in concept to block-Kaczmarz methods introduced by Eggermont et al. (1981) for iterative reconstruction. Simultaneous iterative reconstruction (SIRT) and multiplicative algebraic reconstruction (MART) techniques are well known special cases. Ordered subsets EM (OS-EM) provides a restoration imposing a natural positivity condition and with close links to the EM algorithm. OS-EM is applicable in both single photon (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). In simulation studies in SPECT, the OS-EM algorithm provides an order-of-magnitude acceleration over EM, with restoration quality maintained.

Year:  1994        PMID: 18218538     DOI: 10.1109/42.363108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  589 in total

1.  4D maximum a posteriori reconstruction in dynamic SPECT using a compartmental model-based prior.

Authors:  D J Kadrmas; G T Gullberg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Early diagnosis and follow-up of aortitis with [(18)F]FDG PET and MRI.

Authors:  J Meller; F Strutz; U Siefker; A Scheel; C O Sahlmann; K Lehmann; M Conrad; R Vosshenrich
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The value of (18)FDG-PET for the detection of infected hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Benedicte Vanquickenborne; Alex Maes; Johan Nuyts; Frank Van Acker; Jos Stuyck; Michiel Mulier; Alfons Verbruggen; Luc Mortelmans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  A combined static-dynamic single-dose imaging protocol to compare quantitative dynamic SPECT with static conventional SPECT.

Authors:  Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Towards PET imaging of intact pancreatic beta cell mass: a transgenic strategy.

Authors:  Rebecca McGirr; Shirley Hu; Siu-Pok Yee; Michael S Kovacs; Ting-Yim Lee; Savita Dhanvantari
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Distribution of cell-free and cell-associated HIV surrogates in the colon after simulated receptive anal intercourse in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Nicolette A Louissaint; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Edward J Fuchs; Rahul P Bakshi; Ying-Jun Cao; Linda A Lee; Jeff Goldsmith; Brian S Caffo; Yong Du; Karen E King; Frederick A Menendez; Michael S Torbenson; Craig W Hendrix
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  MRI-based motion correction of thoracic PET: initial comparison of acquisition protocols and correction strategies suitable for simultaneous PET/MRI systems.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dikaios; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Martin J Graves; Venkatesh Mani; Zahi A Fayad; Tim D Fryer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparison of 3D OS-EM and 4D MAP-RBI-EM reconstruction algorithms for cardiac motion abnormality classification using a motion observer.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Taek-Soo Lee; Xin He; W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Partial volume effect correction in SPECT for striatal uptake measurements in patients with neurodegenerative diseases: impact upon patient classification.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Pierre Malick Koulibaly; Jacques Darcourt; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Measuring [(18)F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Elsken van der Wall; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.