Literature DB >> 20736497

A fillable micro-hollow sphere lesion detection phantom using superposition.

Frank P Difilippo1, Sven L Gallo, Ryan S Klatte, Sagar Patel.   

Abstract

The lesion detection performance of SPECT and PET scanners is most commonly evaluated with a phantom containing hollow spheres in a background chamber at a specified radionuclide contrast ratio. However, there are limitations associated with a miniature version of a hollow sphere phantom for small-animal SPECT and PET scanners. One issue is that the 'wall effect' associated with zero activity in the sphere wall and fill port causes significant errors for small diameter spheres. Another issue is that there are practical difficulties in fabricating and in filling very small spheres (<3 mm diameter). The need for lesion detection performance assessment of small-animal scanners has motivated our development of a micro-hollow sphere phantom that utilizes the principle of superposition. The phantom is fabricated by stereolithography and has interchangeable sectors containing hollow spheres with volumes ranging from 1 to 14 microL (diameters ranging from 1.25 to 3.0 mm). A simple 60 degrees internal rotation switches the positions of three such sectors with their corresponding background regions. Raw data from scans of each rotated configuration are combined and reconstructed to yield superposition images. Since the sphere counts and background counts are acquired separately, the wall effect is eliminated. The raw data are subsampled randomly prior to summation and reconstruction to specify the desired sphere-to-background contrast ratio of the superposition image. A set of images with multiple contrast ratios is generated for visual assessment of lesion detection thresholds. To demonstrate the utility of the phantom, data were acquired with a multi-pinhole SPECT/CT scanner. Micro-liter syringes were successful in filling the small hollow spheres, and the accuracy of the dispensed volume was validated through repeated filling and weighing of the spheres. The phantom's internal rotation and the data analysis process were successful in producing the expected superposition images. Visual inspection of the multi-contrast images provided simple determination of lesion detection thresholds for this scanner (4:1 ratio for 1.5 mm spheres and 3:1 ratio for 2.0 mm spheres) at a specified cumulated background concentration (30 kBq-min microL(-1)). In summary, the micro-hollow sphere phantom demonstrated its practical utility for lesion detection evaluation and is well suited for comparing the task-based performance of small-animal SPECT and PET scanners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736497      PMCID: PMC2943202          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/18/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  A novel phantom design for emission tomography enabling scatter- and attenuation-"free" single-photon emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  S A Larsson; C Jonsson; M Pagani; L Johansson; H Jacobsson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-02

2.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; James P Price; Daniel N Kelsch; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Design and fabrication of phantoms using stereolithography for small-animal imaging systems.

Authors:  Mi-Ae Park; Robert E Zimmerman; Andrew Taberner; Michael W Kaye; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Effects of cold sphere walls in PET phantom measurements on the volume reproducing threshold.

Authors:  F Hofheinz; S Dittrich; C Pötzsch; J van den Hoff
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The effect of phantom wall thickness on volume determination in SPET.

Authors:  P G Hillel; D L Hastings
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Noel F Black; James J Hamill; Vladimir Y Panin; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Paula A Santos; Ramsey D Badawi; Clay H Holdsworth; Annick D Van Den Abbeele; Marie Foley Kijewski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Design and performance of a multi-pinhole collimation device for small animal imaging with clinical SPECT and SPECT-CT scanners.

Authors:  Frank P Difilippo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of small-animal multipinhole μSPECT scanners for mouse imaging.

Authors:  Steven Deleye; Roel Van Holen; Jeroen Verhaeghe; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Sigrid Stroobants; Steven Staelens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Quantitative evaluation of PSMA PET imaging using a realistic anthropomorphic phantom and shell-less radioactive epoxy lesions.

Authors:  Roberto Fedrigo; Dan J Kadrmas; Patricia E Edem; Lauren Fougner; Ivan S Klyuzhin; M Peter Petric; François Bénard; Arman Rahmim; Carlos Uribe
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-01-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.