Literature DB >> 24029682

Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Arman Rahmim1, Jing Tang.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography imaging is affected by a number of resolution degrading phenomena, including positron range, photon non-collinearity and inter-crystal blurring. An approach to this issue is to model some or all of these effects within the image reconstruction task, referred to as resolution modeling (RM). This approach is commonly observed to yield images of higher resolution and subsequently contrast, and can be thought of as improving the modulation transfer function. Nonetheless, RM can substantially alter the noise distribution. In this work, we utilize noise propagation models in order to accurately characterize the noise texture of reconstructed images in the presence of RM. Furthermore we consider the task of lesion or defect detection, which is highly determined by the noise distribution as quantified using the noise power spectrum. Ultimately, we use this framework to demonstrate why conventional trade-off analyses (e.g. contrast versus noise, using simplistic noise metrics) do not provide a complete picture of the impact of RM and that improved performance of RM according to such analyses does not necessarily translate to the superiority of RM in detection task performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24029682      PMCID: PMC3866837          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/19/6945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  74 in total

1.  Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels.

Authors:  Claude Comtat; Paul E Kinahan; Jeffrey A Fessler; Thomas Beyer; David W Townsend; Michel Defrise; Christian Michel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Optimum compensation method and filter cutoff frequency in myocardial SPECT: a human observer study.

Authors:  Sharlini Sankaran; Eric C Frey; Karen L Gilland; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.

Authors:  Thomas Frese; Ned C Rouze; Charles A Bouman; Ken Sauer; Gary D Hutchins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  LROC analysis of detector-response compensation in SPECT.

Authors:  H C Gifford; M A King; R G Wells; W G Hawkins; M V Narayanan; P H Pretorius
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  An improved analytical detector response function model for multilayer small-diameter PET scanners.

Authors:  D Strul; R B Slates; M Dahlbom; S R Cherry; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  Matthew A Kupinski; John W Hoppin; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Eric C Frey; Karen L Gilland; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Positron emission tomography partial volume correction: estimation and algorithms.

Authors:  John A D Aston; Vincent J Cunningham; Marie-Claude Asselin; Alexander Hammers; Alan C Evans; Roger N Gunn
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manoj V Narayanan; Michael A King; P Hendrik Pretorius; Seth T Dahlberg; Frederick Spencer; Ellen Simon; Eric Ewald; Edward Healy; Kirk MacNaught; Jeffrey A Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  15 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for 18F-FDG cardiac PET: A multi-center phantom study.

Authors:  Roberta Matheoud; Michela Lecchi; Domenico Lizio; Camilla Scabbio; Claudio Marcassa; Lucia Leva; Angelo Del Sole; Carlo Rodella; Luca Indovina; Christian Bracco; Marco Brambilla; Orazio Zoccarato
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for solving the penalized-likelihood SPECT reconstruction problem.

Authors:  Si Li; Jiahan Zhang; Andrzej Krol; C Ross Schmidtlein; David Feiglin; Yuesheng Xu
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Understanding the impact of advanced PET reconstruction in cardiac PET: The devil is in the details.

Authors:  Ian S Armstrong
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Time-of-flight in cardiac PET/TC: What do we know and what we should know?

Authors:  Roberta Matheoud; Michela Lecchi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on detectability of myocardial defects in PET.

Authors:  Joshua Schaefferkoetter; Jinsong Ouyang; Yothin Rakvongthai; Carmela Nappi; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Anatomy-guided brain PET imaging incorporating a joint prior model.

Authors:  Lijun Lu; Jianhua Ma; Qianjin Feng; Wufan Chen; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.

Authors:  Sahar Rezaei; Pardis Ghafarian; Mehrdad Bakhshayesh-Karam; Carlos F Uribe; Arman Rahmim; Saeed Sarkar; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Impact of image reconstruction methods on quantitative accuracy and variability of FDG-PET volumetric and textural measures in solid tumors.

Authors:  Ali Ketabi; Pardis Ghafarian; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Seyed Rabi Mahdavi; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Effective noise-suppressed and artifact-reduced reconstruction of SPECT data using a preconditioned alternating projection algorithm.

Authors:  Si Li; Jiahan Zhang; Andrzej Krol; C Ross Schmidtlein; Levon Vogelsang; Lixin Shen; Edward Lipson; David Feiglin; Yuesheng Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation-maximization reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Michael E Casey; Martin A Lodge; Arman Rahmim; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.