Literature DB >> 27499550

Effect of Using 2mm Voxels on Observer Performance for PET Lesion Detection.

A Michael Morey1, Frédéric Noo2, Dan J Kadrmas3.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) images are typically reconstructed with an in-plane pixel size of approximately 4mm for cancer imaging. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of using smaller pixels on general oncologic lesion-detection. A series of observer studies was performed using experimental phantom data from the Utah PET Lesion Detection Database, which modeled whole-body FDG PET cancer imaging of a 92kg patient. The data comprised 24 scans over 4 days on a Biograph mCT time-of-flight (TOF) PET/CT scanner, with up to 23 lesions (diam. 6-16mm) distributed throughout the phantom each day. Images were reconstructed with 2.036mm and 4.073mm pixels using ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OSEM) both with and without point spread function (PSF) modeling and TOF. Detection performance was assessed using the channelized non-prewhitened numerical observer with localization receiver operating characteristic (LROC) analysis. Tumor localization performance and the area under the LROC curve were then analyzed as functions of the pixel size. In all cases, the images with ~2mm pixels provided higher detection performance than those with ~4mm pixels. The degree of improvement from the smaller pixels was larger than that offered by PSF modeling for these data, and provided roughly half the benefit of using TOF. Key results were confirmed by two human observers, who read subsets of the test data. This study suggests that a significant improvement in tumor detection performance for PET can be attained by using smaller voxel sizes than commonly used at many centers. The primary drawback is a 4-fold increase in reconstruction time and data storage requirements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; PET/CT reconstruction; image quality assessment; image reconstruction

Year:  2016        PMID: 27499550      PMCID: PMC4970864          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2016.2518177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  15 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Rapid Computation of LROC Figures of Merit Using Numerical Observers (for SPECT/PET Reconstruction).

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Gene Gindi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.679

3.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Fast LROC analysis of Bayesian reconstructed emission tomographic images using model observers.

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Gene Gindi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Nonparametric ROC and LROC analysis.

Authors:  Lucretiu M Popescu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; M Bugrahan Oktay; Michael E Casey; James J Hamill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Noel F Black; James J Hamill; Vladimir Y Panin; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance.

Authors:  R D Fiete; H H Barrett; W E Smith; K J Myers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Bjoern W Jakoby; Cristina Lois; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging.

Authors:  H C Gifford; M A King; D J de Vries; E J Soares
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET.

Authors:  Charlotte S van der Vos; Daniëlle Koopman; Sjoerd Rijnsdorp; Albert J Arends; Ronald Boellaard; Jorn A van Dalen; Mark Lubberink; Antoon T M Willemsen; Eric P Visser
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Minimum lesion detectability as a measure of PET system performance.

Authors:  Stephen Adler; Jurgen Seidel; Peter Choyke; Michael V Knopp; Katherine Binzel; Jun Zhang; Craig Barker; Shielah Conant; Roberto Maass-Moreno
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-03-04

3.  Quantitative evaluation of PSMA PET imaging using a realistic anthropomorphic phantom and shell-less radioactive epoxy lesions.

Authors:  Roberto Fedrigo; Dan J Kadrmas; Patricia E Edem; Lauren Fougner; Ivan S Klyuzhin; M Peter Petric; François Bénard; Arman Rahmim; Carlos Uribe
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-01-15

4.  Diagnostic implications of a small-voxel reconstruction for loco-regional lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Daniëlle Koopman; Jorn A van Dalen; Hester Arkies; Ad H J Oostdijk; Anne Brecht Francken; Jos Bart; Cornelis H Slump; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.138

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.