Literature DB >> 19175138

Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT.

Xiang Li, Ehsan Samei, W Paul Segars, Gregory M Sturgeon, James G Colsher, Donald P Frush.   

Abstract

Current methods for organ and effective dose estimations in pediatric CT are largely patient generic. Physical phantoms and computer models have only been developed for standard/limited patient sizes at discrete ages (e.g., 0, 1, 5, 10, 15 years old) and do not reflect the variability of patient anatomy and body habitus within the same size/age group. In this investigation, full-body computer models of seven pediatric patients in the same size/protocol group (weight: 11.9-18.2 kg) were created based on the patients' actual multi-detector array CT (MDCT) data. Organs and structures in the scan coverage were individually segmented. Other organs and structures were created by morphing existing adult models (developed from visible human data) to match the framework defined by the segmented organs, referencing the organ volume and anthropometry data in ICRP Publication 89. Organ and effective dose of these patients from a chest MDCT scan protocol (64 slice LightSpeed VCT scanner, 120 kVp, 70 or 75 mA, 0.4 s gantry rotation period, pitch of 1.375, 20 mm beam collimation, and small body scan field-of-view) was calculated using a Monte Carlo program previously developed and validated to simulate radiation transport in the same CT system. The seven patients had normalized effective dose of 3.7-5.3 mSv/100 mAs (coefficient of variation: 10.8%). Normalized lung dose and heart dose were 10.4-12.6 mGy/100 mAs and 11.2-13.3 mGy/100 mAs, respectively. Organ dose variations across the patients were generally small for large organs in the scan coverage (<7%), but large for small organs in the scan coverage (9%-18%) and for partially or indirectly exposed organs (11%-77%). Normalized effective dose correlated weakly with body weight (correlation coefficient: r=-0.80). Normalized lung dose and heart dose correlated strongly with mid-chest equivalent diameter (lung: r=-0.99, heart: r=-0.93); these strong correlation relationships can be used to estimate patient-specific organ dose for any other patient in the same size/protocol group who undergoes the chest scan. In summary, this work reported the first assessment of dose variations across pediatric CT patients in the same size/protocol group due to the variability of patient anatomy and body habitus and provided a previously unavailable method for patient-specific organ dose estimation, which will help in assessing patient risk and optimizing dose reduction strategies, including the development of scan protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175138      PMCID: PMC3910243          DOI: 10.1118/1.3026593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  19 in total

Review 1.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients.

Authors:  Otha W Linton; Fred A Mettler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.

Authors:  I A Castellano; D R Dance; P M Evans
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index.

Authors:  Edward L Nickoloff; Ajoy K Dutta; Zheng F Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Photoelectron enhancement of the absorbed dose from X rays to human bone marrow: experimental and theoretical studies.

Authors:  S D King; F W Spiers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  An EGS4-ready tomographic computational model of a 14-year-old female torso for calculating organ doses from CT examinations.

Authors:  M Caon; G Bibbo; J Pattison
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations.

Authors:  A Khursheed; M C Hillier; P C Shrimpton; B F Wall
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination.

Authors:  Choonik Lee; Choonsik Lee; Robert J Staton; David E Hintenlang; Manuel M Arreola; Jonathon L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; M Zankl; E Angel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Hybrid computational phantoms of the 15-year male and female adolescent: applications to CT organ dosimetry for patients of variable morphometry.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  21 in total

1.  MCAT to XCAT: The Evolution of 4-D Computerized Phantoms for Imaging Research: Computer models that take account of body movements promise to provide evaluation and improvement of medical imaging devices and technology.

Authors:  W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.961

2.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Deformable torso phantoms of Chinese adults for personalized anatomy modelling.

Authors:  Hongkai Wang; Xiaobang Sun; Tongning Wu; Congsheng Li; Zhonghua Chen; Meiying Liao; Mengci Li; Wen Yan; Hui Huang; Jia Yang; Ziyu Tan; Libo Hui; Yue Liu; Hang Pan; Yue Qu; Zhaofeng Chen; Liwen Tan; Lijuan Yu; Hongcheng Shi; Li Huo; Yanjun Zhang; Xin Tang; Shaoxiang Zhang; Changjian Liu
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Patient-specific dose calculations for pediatric CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Susan D Kost; Nicholas D Fraser; Diana E Carver; David R Pickens; Ronald R Price; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Michael G Stabin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-04

5.  Realistic phantoms to characterize dosimetry in pediatric CT.

Authors:  Diana E Carver; Susan D Kost; Nicholas D Fraser; W Paul Segars; David R Pickens; Ronald R Price; Michael G Stabin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-03-10

6.  Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior-posterior chest diameter.

Authors:  Patrik Rogalla; Jörg Blobel; Sonja Kandel; Henning Meyer; Jürgen Mews; Christian Kloeters; Hany Kashani; Alexander Lembcke; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  PATIENT-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES IN DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION EXAMINATION.

Authors:  V-M Sundell; M Kortesniemi; T Siiskonen; A Kosunen; S Rosendahl; L Büermann
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Jorge Hurtado; Deanna Pafundi; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Using the Microsoft Kinect for patient size estimation and radiation dose normalization: proof of concept and initial validation.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Gregory Couch; Timothy J Couch; Woojin Kim; William W Boonn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.