Literature DB >> 23344260

Using the Microsoft Kinect for patient size estimation and radiation dose normalization: proof of concept and initial validation.

Tessa S Cook1, Gregory Couch, Timothy J Couch, Woojin Kim, William W Boonn.   

Abstract

Monitoring patients' imaging-related radiation is currently a hot topic, but there are many obstacles to accurate, patient-specific dose estimation. While some, such as easier access to dose data and parameters, have been overcome, the challenge remains as to how accurately these dose estimates reflect the actual dose received by the patient. The main parameter that is often not considered is patient size. There are many surrogates-weight, body mass index, effective diameter-but none of these truly reflect the three-dimensional "size" of an individual. In this work, we present and evaluate a novel approach to estimating patient volume using the Microsoft Kinect™, a combination RGB camera-infrared depth sensor device. The goal of using this device is to generate a three-dimensional estimate of patient size, in order to more effectively model the dimensions of the anatomy of interest and not only enable better normalization of dose estimates but also promote more patient-specific protocoling of future CT examinations. Preliminary testing and validation of this system reveals good correlation when individuals are standing upright with their arms by their sides, but demonstrates some variation with arm position. Further evaluation and testing is necessary with multiple patient positions and in both adult and pediatric patients. Correlation with other patient size metrics will also be helpful, as the ideal measure of patient "size" may in fact be a combination of existing metrics and newly developed techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344260      PMCID: PMC3705007          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9567-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. For the proposition.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they?

Authors:  Walter Huda; Fred A Mettler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The 'Image Gently' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Penny F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss; Nora Tuggle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-01-17

5.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Terry T Yoshizumi; Philip C Goodman; Donald P Frush; Giao Nguyen; Greta Toncheva; Carolyn Lowry
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Speech and motion control for interventional radiology: requirements and feasibility.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Michael B Pitton; Peter Mildenberger; Christoph Düber
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A new, effective and low-cost three-dimensional approach for the estimation of upper-limb volume.

Authors:  Roberto Buffa; Elena Mereu; Paolo Lussu; Valeria Succa; Tonino Pisanu; Franco Buffa; Elisabetta Marini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Using a Somatosensory Controller to Assess Body Size for Size-Specific Dose Estimates in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jay Wu; Ruo-Ping Han; Yan-Lin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Perspective: Are We Ready to Measure Child Nutritional Status with Lasers?

Authors:  Joel Conkle; Reynaldo Martorell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Body Weight Estimation for Dose-Finding and Health Monitoring of Lying, Standing and Walking Patients Based on RGB-D Data.

Authors:  Christian Pfitzner; Stefan May; Andreas Nüchter
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.